Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a critical complexity boundary in Anonymous Multi-Agent Path Finding (AMAPF), proving that minimizing sum-of-costs becomes NP-hard when agents must remain at their goals rather than disappearing upon arrival. By demonstrating a reduction from 3-SAT, the study highlights how minor variations in agent behavior constraints fundamentally alter the algorithmic tractability of multi-agent systems. This distinction is vital for researchers developing scalable pathfinding algorithms for robotics and distributed AI environments where task completion requires persistent state retention.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Goal Staying Makes Sum-of-Costs Anonymous Multi-Agent Path Finding NP-Hard

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.28658v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Anonymous Multi-Agent Path Finding (AMAPF) admits polynomial-time network-flow algorithms for several objectives, including makespan, total distance, and sum-of-costs (SoC) when agents disappear upon reaching goals. We show that standard goal-staying AMAPF is fundamentally different. We first formulate SoC minimization by augmenting the standard time-expanded flow model with goal-settlement constraints and show that the resulting linear programming relaxation is non-integral. We then prove that minimizing SoC in goal-staying AMAPF is NP-hard via a reduction from 3-SAT. Together with the polynomial-time result for the disappearing variant, this establishes a sharp complexity boundary determined by whether completed agents remain at their goals.

Abstract:Anonymous Multi-Agent Path Finding (AMAPF) admits polynomial-time network-flow algorithms for several objectives, including makespan, total distance, and sum-of-costs (SoC) when agents disappear upon reaching goals. We show that standard goal-staying AMAPF is fundamentally different. We first formulate SoC minimization by augmenting the standard time-expanded flow model with goal-settlement constraints and show that the resulting linear programming relaxation is non-integral. We then prove that minimizing SoC in goal-staying AMAPF is NP-hard via a reduction from 3-SAT. Together with the polynomial-time result for the disappearing variant, this establishes a sharp complexity boundary determined by whether completed agents remain at their goals.

Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2608.28658 [cs.MA]

(or arXiv:2608.28658v1 [cs.MA] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28658 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 198 words

Related coverage