aiqbench analysis
This research introduces GHOST-Q, a framework that exposes critical gaps between aggregate accuracy metrics and visual grounding reliability in quantized vision-language models. By analyzing hallucination-sensitive benchmarks across FP16, INT8, and NF4 precisions, the study reveals that memory compression can significantly alter generation behavior without necessarily improving inference latency. These findings urge developers to evaluate quantized VLMs holistically, prioritizing grounding stability alongside standard utility scores for robust deployment.
GHOST-Q: Towards Studying Grounding Hallucinations Overlooked Under Same-score TradeOffs in Quantized VLMS
arXiv:2609.29999v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Post-training quantization of vision--language models (VLMs) is typically assessed through aggregate task accuracy and memory savings, but preserving a headline score does not guarantee preservation of visual grounding behavior. We present GHOST-Q, a cross-precision controlled evaluation of three 8B VLM families under FP16, INT8, and NF4 across utility and hallucination-sensitive benchmarks. Rather than comparing only aggregate accuracy, we pair FP16 and quantized predictions item by-item to quantify how compression redistributes grounding successes and failures. Five of six quantized variants preserve MMStar accuracy within $\pm2$ percentage points, yet 10 of 36 paired effects remain significant after false-discovery-rate correction, nine on hallucination-sensitive conditions. Same-device A100 profiling further demonstrates that substantial memory reduction does not necessarily mean lower inference latency. Finally, an open-ended AMBER audit reveals strong generation budget censoring whose severity varies by architecture and precision. These results show that quantized VLMs should be evaluated jointly for aggregate utility, grounding reliability, generation behavior, and realized deployment efficiency.
Abstract:Post-training quantization of vision--language models (VLMs) is typically assessed through aggregate task accuracy and memory savings, but preserving a headline score does not guarantee preservation of visual grounding behavior. We present GHOST-Q, a cross-precision controlled evaluation of three 8B VLM families under FP16, INT8, and NF4 across utility and hallucination-sensitive benchmarks. Rather than comparing only aggregate accuracy, we pair FP16 and quantized predictions item by-item to quantify how compression redistributes grounding successes and failures. Five of six quantized variants preserve MMStar accuracy within $\pm2$ percentage points, yet 10 of 36 paired effects remain significant after false-discovery-rate correction, nine on hallucination-sensitive conditions. Same-device A100 profiling further demonstrates that substantial memory reduction does not necessarily mean lower inference latency. Finally, an open-ended AMBER audit reveals strong generation budget censoring whose severity varies by architecture and precision. These results show that quantized VLMs should be evaluated jointly for aggregate utility, grounding reliability, generation behavior, and realized deployment efficiency.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multimedia (cs.MM)
arXiv:2609.29999 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.29999v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29999 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 260 words
Related coverage
Construct validity of Claude Opus 4.8's System Card – A commentary
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026
The Most Forbidden Technique is not always forbidden
LessWrong · Jul 18, 2026

Always ask your agent to be honest
LessWrong · Sep 16, 2026
Can we make sense out of negative kinetic energy?
arXiv · Oct 8, 2026