Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

GhazalBench introduces a novel benchmark that distinguishes between semantic understanding and the ability to retrieve exact canonical surface forms in Persian poetry, revealing a significant gap in open-ended completion tasks for multilingual models. The study suggests that these limitations stem primarily from training data exposure rather than architectural constraints, as evidenced by stronger performance on English sonnets. This work underscores the necessity for evaluation frameworks that jointly assess meaning, form, and cue-dependent access to culturally significant texts.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

GhazalBench: Evaluating LLM Understanding and Canonical Surface-Form Access in Persian Ghazals

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2603.09979v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Persian poetry plays an active role in Iranian cultural practice, where verses by canonical poets such as Hafez are frequently quoted, paraphrased, or completed from partial cues. Supporting such interactions requires language models to engage not only with poetic meaning but also with culturally canonical surface form. We introduce GhazalBench, a benchmark for evaluating how large language models (LLMs) interact with Persian ghazals under usage-grounded conditions. Unlike prior work that primarily studies memorization as a liability, GhazalBench examines settings where access to exact surface form is functionally important for culturally grounded interaction. The benchmark evaluates two complementary abilities: poem-to-prose understanding and canonical surface-form access under varying semantic and lexical cues. Across several proprietary and open-weight multilingual LLMs, we observe a consistent dissociation: models generally capture poetic meaning but struggle to produce exact verse completions in open-ended settings, while recognition-based settings substantially reduce this gap. Parallel experiments on English sonnets show markedly stronger completion performance, suggesting that these limitations are tied more to differences in training exposure than to inherent architectural constraints. Our findings highlight the need for evaluation frameworks that jointly assess meaning, form, and cue-dependent access to culturally significant texts. GhazalBench is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GhazalBench/.

Abstract:Persian poetry plays an active role in Iranian cultural practice, where verses by canonical poets such as Hafez are frequently quoted, paraphrased, or completed from partial cues. Supporting such interactions requires language models to engage not only with poetic meaning but also with culturally canonical surface form. We introduce GhazalBench, a benchmark for evaluating how large language models (LLMs) interact with Persian ghazals under usage-grounded conditions. Unlike prior work that primarily studies memorization as a liability, GhazalBench examines settings where access to exact surface form is functionally important for culturally grounded interaction. The benchmark evaluates two complementary abilities: poem-to-prose understanding and canonical surface-form access under varying semantic and lexical cues. Across several proprietary and open-weight multilingual LLMs, we observe a consistent dissociation: models generally capture poetic meaning but struggle to produce exact verse completions in open-ended settings, while recognition-based settings substantially reduce this gap. Parallel experiments on English sonnets show markedly stronger completion performance, suggesting that these limitations are tied more to differences in training exposure than to inherent architectural constraints. Our findings highlight the need for evaluation frameworks that jointly assess meaning, form, and cue-dependent access to culturally significant texts. GhazalBench is available at this https URL.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2603.09979 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2603.09979v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.09979 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words

Related coverage