aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates a method to estimate inference throughput for llama.cpp models directly from GGUF metadata, achieving significantly lower error rates than total-parameter baselines across heterogeneous hardware including Apple M4 Max and NVIDIA RTX 5080. The study highlights that while quantization-aware predictors improve accuracy, efficiency profiles remain specific to host configurations rather than being universally transferable.
GGUF-Metadata Prediction of Single-Sequence llama.cpp Throughput Across Three Systems
arXiv:2609.14864v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We predict single-sequence model throughput from GGUF metadata using roofline-shaped predictors with quantization-specific scale factors fitted on reference models. The scored cohort comprises 318 phase-depth measurements from 53 host-file configurations on two Apple M4 Max systems and an NVIDIA RTX 5080. On host-specific held-out sets of four, five, and two configurations, an active-parameter decode model obtains 13.1%, 14.4%, and 36.1% mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), versus 49.4%, 55.3%, and 51.9% when charging total parameters. Leave-one-host-out coefficients fitted on the other two systems yield 11.6%, 16.8%, and 36.0% test MAPE. A low-bit model ladder changes ordering across runtime stacks. The P2 prefill baseline gives 18.7%, 22.2%, and 108.2% test MAPE. GGUF structure helps on all three systems, but fitted efficiencies are not universal.
Title:GGUF-Metadata Prediction of Single-Sequence llama.cpp Throughput Across Three Systems
Abstract:We predict single-sequence model throughput from GGUF metadata using roofline-shaped predictors with quantization-specific scale factors fitted on reference models. The scored cohort comprises 318 phase-depth measurements from 53 host-file configurations on two Apple M4 Max systems and an NVIDIA RTX 5080. On host-specific held-out sets of four, five, and two configurations, an active-parameter decode model obtains 13.1%, 14.4%, and 36.1% mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), versus 49.4%, 55.3%, and 51.9% when charging total parameters. Leave-one-host-out coefficients fitted on the other two systems yield 11.6%, 16.8%, and 36.0% test MAPE. A low-bit model ladder changes ordering across runtime stacks. The P2 prefill baseline gives 18.7%, 22.2%, and 108.2% test MAPE. GGUF structure helps on all three systems, but fitted efficiencies are not universal.
27 pages: 5-page manuscript with 4 figures, followed by a 22-page supplementary results appendix. Submitted to ICASSP 2027
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Performance (cs.PF)
arXiv:2609.14864 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.14864v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14864 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 248 words
Related coverage

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · Sep 4, 2026

[AINews] Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

Multi-Region training with Amazon SageMaker HyperPod and Qumulo
AWS · Sep 25, 2026