aiqbench analysis
This paper addresses critical limitations in navigation foundation models by introducing GG-Nav, a framework that leverages structured chain-of-thought reasoning to better utilize streaming visual observations. By explicitly localizing goals and accumulating grounding evidence across intermediate frames, the approach significantly reduces stopping errors and improves success rates on standard benchmarks like HM3D ObjectNav. The method demonstrates practical viability through zero-shot deployment on a Unitree Go2 robot in unseen real-world environments.
GG-Nav: Goal-oriented Grounding Chain-of-Thought Elicits Reasoning in Navigation Foundation Models
arXiv:2610.14541v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Emerging strong Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have advanced navigation foundation models. However, these models still have unsatisfactory performance on goal-oriented navigation settings. In this paper, we first conduct a motivating study revealing that the key issue lies in the insufficient utilization of streaming observations and imprecise target localization. To tackle these challenges, we propose GG-Nav, a simple yet effective navigation framework that learns a structured chain-of-thought (CoT) mechanism via supervised fine-tuning to explicitly localize goal-relevant instances, accumulate grounding evidence, and support more reliable decision-making. Specifically, the structured CoT is designed with two key stages: (i) Observation-to-Evidence, which reasons over all intermediate frames between adjacent decision steps to retain useful goal-related evidence; and (ii) Evidence-to-Decision, which integrates the current observation with accumulated evidence to ground the target and support the generation of navigation actions or clarification questions. Extensive experiments show that GG-Nav outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of success rates on the HM3D ObjectNav, VL-LN, and CoIN benchmarks by 3.1%, 16.6%, and 5.3%, respectively. Ablation studies further show that accumulating evidence from intermediate observations reduces evidence-missing failures by 11.6%, while explicit grounding reduces stopping errors by 49.4%. We also deploy GG-Nav on a Unitree Go2 robot, demonstrating its zero-shot generalization capability in unseen real-world environments.
Abstract:Emerging strong Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have advanced navigation foundation models. However, these models still have unsatisfactory performance on goal-oriented navigation settings. In this paper, we first conduct a motivating study revealing that the key issue lies in the insufficient utilization of streaming observations and imprecise target localization. To tackle these challenges, we propose GG-Nav, a simple yet effective navigation framework that learns a structured chain-of-thought (CoT) mechanism via supervised fine-tuning to explicitly localize goal-relevant instances, accumulate grounding evidence, and support more reliable decision-making. Specifically, the structured CoT is designed with two key stages: (i) Observation-to-Evidence, which reasons over all intermediate frames between adjacent decision steps to retain useful goal-related evidence; and (ii) Evidence-to-Decision, which integrates the current observation with accumulated evidence to ground the target and support the generation of navigation actions or clarification questions. Extensive experiments show that GG-Nav outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of success rates on the HM3D ObjectNav, VL-LN, and CoIN benchmarks by 3.1%, 16.6%, and 5.3%, respectively. Ablation studies further show that accumulating evidence from intermediate observations reduces evidence-missing failures by 11.6%, while explicit grounding reduces stopping errors by 49.4%. We also deploy GG-Nav on a Unitree Go2 robot, demonstrating its zero-shot generalization capability in unseen real-world environments.
22 pages. Project page: this https URL
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.14541 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.14541v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14541 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 307 words
Related coverage
Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026
Presentation: From Hype to Strong Foundations: What the Rise, Fall and Resurgence of Agents Can Teach Us About Outlasting the Cycle
InfoQ · Jun 17, 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026