aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Geometric Mean Pooling (GMP), a novel aggregation operator designed to mitigate the additive and extremal biases inherent in standard average and max pooling layers. Drawing inspiration from local-to-global composition principles in quantum many-body physics, GMP preserves joint sign information and multiplicative scales without requiring learnable parameters. While it demonstrates superior accuracy on synthetic tasks involving product-based signals, its efficacy remains contingent on specific data representations and task parameterizations rather than serving as a universal replacement for existing methods.
Geometric Mean Pooling for Equal-Weight Multiplicative Coarse-Graining
arXiv:2609.21876v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As an alternative to the additive and extremal biases of average and max pooling, we introduce Geometric Mean Pooling (GMP), a signed pooling operator that combines the product of feature signs with the geometric mean of feature magnitudes. Motivated by local-to-global composition in quantum many-body physics, GMP retains both joint sign information and a characteristic multiplicative scale without introducing learnable pooling parameters. We show that non-overlapping hierarchical GMP preserves the corresponding global multiplicative statistic and evaluate it on synthetic sequence tasks, iterative coarse-graining, image classification, and molecular lipophilicity regression. On the synthetic tasks, GMP recovers product-based signals more accurately than average and max pooling and maintains predictive performance under the tested levels of multiplicative input noise. On image and molecular data, however, its effectiveness depends on the representation, target parameterization, and placement of local and global pooling. These results position GMP as a complementary, regime-dependent inductive bias for tasks in which equal-weight multiplicative composition is plausible, rather than as a universal replacement for standard pooling operators.
Abstract:As an alternative to the additive and extremal biases of average and max pooling, we introduce Geometric Mean Pooling (GMP), a signed pooling operator that combines the product of feature signs with the geometric mean of feature magnitudes. Motivated by local-to-global composition in quantum many-body physics, GMP retains both joint sign information and a characteristic multiplicative scale without introducing learnable pooling parameters. We show that non-overlapping hierarchical GMP preserves the corresponding global multiplicative statistic and evaluate it on synthetic sequence tasks, iterative coarse-graining, image classification, and molecular lipophilicity regression. On the synthetic tasks, GMP recovers product-based signals more accurately than average and max pooling and maintains predictive performance under the tested levels of multiplicative input noise. On image and molecular data, however, its effectiveness depends on the representation, target parameterization, and placement of local and global pooling. These results position GMP as a complementary, regime-dependent inductive bias for tasks in which equal-weight multiplicative composition is plausible, rather than as a universal replacement for standard pooling operators.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.21876 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.21876v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21876 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 263 words
Related coverage

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026
Challenging the unawareness argument with third actions and mixed actions
LessWrong · Oct 7, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026