aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Geometric Kernel Diversity (GKD), a novel metric that satisfies three critical axioms for quantifying object diversity in machine learning. By leveraging geometric properties in Euclidean space, the authors provide efficient polynomial-time algorithms for low dimensions and effective randomized approximations for higher dimensions, resolving an open question regarding the computational tractability of axiomatic diversity measures. The work advances theoretical foundations for clustering and representation learning by offering a reliable, computationally feasible alternative to previously NP-hard approaches.
Geometric Kernel Diversity: An Axiomatic Diversity Measure in Euclidean Space
arXiv:2610.19570v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantifying the diversity of a set of objects is a fundamental problem in machine learning and statistics. Mironov and Prokhorenkova (2025) recently showed that three axioms-monotonicity, uniqueness, and continuity-are crucial for a reliable diversity measure and that none of the standard metrics in the literature satisfy all three. They also constructed two measures that do satisfy the axioms, but both are NP-hard to compute, leaving open the question of whether efficient axiomatic diversity measures can exist. We study a Euclidean-restricted version of this question. We introduce Geometric Kernel Diversity (GKD), which associates a radial kernel solid with each point and measures the volume of their union. We show that canonical GKD satisfies all three Mironov-Prokhorenkova axioms on Euclidean-realizable inputs. For canonical GKD, we give exact polynomial-time algorithms in dimensions $d \le 3$. In arbitrary dimensions, we give a randomized algorithm that returns a $(1 \pm \varepsilon)$-approximation with probability at least $1-\delta$ in time $O \left(\frac{nd}{\varepsilon^2}\log\frac{2}{\delta}\right)$ for $n$ points. The axiomatic guarantee applies to exact canonical GKD; the randomized algorithm approximates this deterministic quantity. We further show that the two diversity measures of Mironov and Prokhorenkova (2025) remain NP-hard on Euclidean-realizable inputs and, unless $\mathrm{NP} = \mathrm{RP}$, admit no FPRAS even on this restricted domain.
Abstract:Quantifying the diversity of a set of objects is a fundamental problem in machine learning and statistics. Mironov and Prokhorenkova (2025) recently showed that three axioms-monotonicity, uniqueness, and continuity-are crucial for a reliable diversity measure and that none of the standard metrics in the literature satisfy all three. They also constructed two measures that do satisfy the axioms, but both are NP-hard to compute, leaving open the question of whether efficient axiomatic diversity measures can exist. We study a Euclidean-restricted version of this question. We introduce Geometric Kernel Diversity (GKD), which associates a radial kernel solid with each point and measures the volume of their union. We show that canonical GKD satisfies all three Mironov-Prokhorenkova axioms on Euclidean-realizable inputs. For canonical GKD, we give exact polynomial-time algorithms in dimensions $d \le 3$. In arbitrary dimensions, we give a randomized algorithm that returns a $(1 \pm \varepsilon)$-approximation with probability at least $1-\delta$ in time $O \left(\frac{nd}{\varepsilon^2}\log\frac{2}{\delta}\right)$ for $n$ points. The axiomatic guarantee applies to exact canonical GKD; the randomized algorithm approximates this deterministic quantity. We further show that the two diversity measures of Mironov and Prokhorenkova (2025) remain NP-hard on Euclidean-realizable inputs and, unless $\mathrm{NP} = \mathrm{RP}$, admit no FPRAS even on this restricted domain.
Computational Geometry (cs.CG); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.19570 [cs.CG]
(or arXiv:2610.19570v1 [cs.CG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19570 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 304 words
Related coverage
Data eccentricity, asymptotics of Gaussian RBF reproducing kernel Hilbert space, and kernel PCA
arXiv · Jul 27, 2026
Anisotropic View Distance Metric for High-Dimensional Data: Theory, Geometry, and Fast Computation
arXiv · Sep 4, 2026
Evaluating the Diversity of AI-Generated Content with Diversity Profiles
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026

What can language models teach us about understanding?
LessWrong · Oct 9, 2026