aiqbench analysis
This survey establishes Generative Model Unlearning (GenMU) as a unified field defined by target events, specific operators, and rigorous evaluation protocols for suppressing unwanted outputs while preserving model utility. By framing unlearning through distributional projection, the paper clarifies how these techniques apply to critical challenges like privacy protection, copyright enforcement, safety alignment, and hallucination mitigation in generative AI systems. It identifies key open problems necessary for developing scalable, robust, and auditable methods to manage risks inherent in large-scale generative models.
Generative Model Unlearning: A Survey through Target Events, Unlearning Operators, and Evaluation Protocols
arXiv:2507.19894v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: With the rapid advancement of generative models, privacy, copyright, safety, and reliability risks have attracted growing attention. To mitigate these risks, machine unlearning has been increasingly adapted from traditional classification models to generative settings. Despite notable progress, existing studies remain fragmented in their target definitions, unlearning mechanisms, and evaluation protocols, making objective comparison difficult across models, modalities, and applications. Moreover, modality-specific surveys often overlook the shared structure of Generative Model Unlearning (GenMU). To address this gap, we provide a comprehensive review of GenMU and formulate it as target-constrained distributional projection: given a target event, an unlearning operator transforms the generative distribution to suppress target-related outputs while preserving useful behavior and controlling operator cost. Under this framework, an unlearning request is specified by a target event, implemented through an unlearning operator, and assessed by empirical evidence over target suppression, distribution preservation, and operator cost. We further reorganize existing GenMU studies under this view. From this perspective, we provide the first explicit and unified account of how GenMU connects to mainstream applications, including privacy protection, copyright and style protection, safety alignment, hallucination mitigation, and deployment defense. Finally, we identify key open problems and future directions toward reliable, scalable, robust, and auditable GenMU. We consistently maintain the related open-source materials at https://github.com/caxLee/GenMU-Survey.
Abstract:With the rapid advancement of generative models, privacy, copyright, safety, and reliability risks have attracted growing attention. To mitigate these risks, machine unlearning has been increasingly adapted from traditional classification models to generative settings. Despite notable progress, existing studies remain fragmented in their target definitions, unlearning mechanisms, and evaluation protocols, making objective comparison difficult across models, modalities, and applications. Moreover, modality-specific surveys often overlook the shared structure of Generative Model Unlearning (GenMU). To address this gap, we provide a comprehensive review of GenMU and formulate it as target-constrained distributional projection: given a target event, an unlearning operator transforms the generative distribution to suppress target-related outputs while preserving useful behavior and controlling operator cost. Under this framework, an unlearning request is specified by a target event, implemented through an unlearning operator, and assessed by empirical evidence over target suppression, distribution preservation, and operator cost. We further reorganize existing GenMU studies under this view. From this perspective, we provide the first explicit and unified account of how GenMU connects to mainstream applications, including privacy protection, copyright and style protection, safety alignment, hallucination mitigation, and deployment defense. Finally, we identify key open problems and future directions toward reliable, scalable, robust, and auditable GenMU. We consistently maintain the related open-source materials at this https URL.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2507.19894 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2507.19894v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.19894 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words
Related coverage

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026
A Red Line and Oversight Framework for Government AI Contracts
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 18, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

Global Challenges in AI Safety for Biosecurity
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026