aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Generative Marketing Mix Modeling (GMMM), a causal inference framework designed to quantify the business impact of Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and Generative Engine Marketing (GEM). By integrating notice probabilities with generated answer data, the method addresses a critical gap in standard marketing analytics where user exposure within AI responses is previously unrecorded. The study validates this approach through simulations on product recommendations across English and Japanese datasets, establishing conditions for identifying treatment effects in generative systems.
Generative Marketing Mix Modeling: A Causal Inference Framework Linking GEO and GEM to Business Impact
arXiv:2609.11915v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence changes how firms reach customers, but standard marketing data do not record how often users see and notice a firm's name in generated answers. We develop Generative Marketing Mix Modeling (GMMM) to estimate the causal effects of Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and Generative Engine Marketing (GEM). For GEO, GMMM combines repeated generated answers with question counts, shares of use across generative systems, and notice probabilities. For GEM, it combines records of sponsored placements with notice probabilities. GMMM compares expected business responses under alternative treatment sequences and establishes sufficient conditions for identifying the resulting effects. We investigate the empirical performance of the proposed method using simulated answers to product recommendation in English and Japanese.
Abstract:Generative artificial intelligence changes how firms reach customers, but standard marketing data do not record how often users see and notice a firm's name in generated answers. We develop Generative Marketing Mix Modeling (GMMM) to estimate the causal effects of Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and Generative Engine Marketing (GEM). For GEO, GMMM combines repeated generated answers with question counts, shares of use across generative systems, and notice probabilities. For GEM, it combines records of sponsored placements with notice probabilities. GMMM compares expected business responses under alternative treatment sequences and establishes sufficient conditions for identifying the resulting effects. We investigate the empirical performance of the proposed method using simulated answers to product recommendation in English and Japanese.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Econometrics (econ.EM); Methodology (stat.ME)
arXiv:2609.11915 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.11915v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.11915 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 220 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

From weeks to minutes: How Formula 1® uses agentic AI on AWS to accelerate data operations
AWS · Aug 3, 2026

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026