aiqbench analysis
This research extends Aumann's agreement theorem into the quantum domain, demonstrating that rational agents cannot agree to disagree even within generalized probability theories. The study establishes that this fundamental constraint on decision theory arises directly from how information is conditioned and processed in both classical and quantum frameworks. By proving the impossibility of disagreement in these systems, the paper offers significant theoretical insights for quantum information science and foundational studies in machine learning under uncertainty.
Generalising Aumann's Agreement Theorem
arXiv:2202.02156v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: According to Aumann's celebrated theorem, rational agents cannot agree to disagree. In other words, agents who once shared a common prior probability distribution and who have common knowledge about their posteriors cannot assign different probability distributions to a given proposition. Common knowledge imposes strong restrictions on assigned probabilities. In fact, Aumann's agreement theorem was one of the first attempts to formalise and explore the role played by common knowledge in decision theory. Recently, the debate over possible (quantum) extensions of Aumann's results has resurfaced. This paper contributes to this discussion. First, we argue that agreeing to disagree is impossible in quantum theory. Secondly, by building on the quantum argument, we show that agreeing to disagree is also forbidden in any generalised probability theory. The upshot is that in its probabilistic version, the agreement theorem is a direct consequence of how we choose to condition upon acquiring new information.
Abstract:According to Aumann's celebrated theorem, rational agents cannot agree to disagree. In other words, agents who once shared a common prior probability distribution and who have common knowledge about their posteriors cannot assign different probability distributions to a given proposition. Common knowledge imposes strong restrictions on assigned probabilities. In fact, Aumann's agreement theorem was one of the first attempts to formalise and explore the role played by common knowledge in decision theory. Recently, the debate over possible (quantum) extensions of Aumann's results has resurfaced. This paper contributes to this discussion. First, we argue that agreeing to disagree is impossible in quantum theory. Secondly, by building on the quantum argument, we show that agreeing to disagree is also forbidden in any generalised probability theory. The upshot is that in its probabilistic version, the agreement theorem is a direct consequence of how we choose to condition upon acquiring new information.
Final version. To appear in Quantum =)
arXiv:2202.02156 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2202.02156v4 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.02156 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 244 words
Related coverage

Generalising Aumann’s Agreement Theorem
Quantum Journal · Sep 18, 2026

Review of Fundamental Uncertainty.
LessWrong · Aug 1, 2026

Anthropic reasoning without duplicates is just standard Bayesian updating
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Aumann’s theorem gets a quantum boost for all generalized probability theories
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 18, 2026