aiqbench analysis
This paper provides a theoretical unification of reinforcement learning, control theory, and decision dynamics by deriving the Bellman equation from three fundamental conditions regarding state decomposition, recursive returns, and uncertainty aggregation. By identifying dualities between probability, return, and aggregation, it offers new mathematical insights into tractability issues that could inform future algorithmic improvements in sequential decision-making systems.
Generalised Bellman recurrence and three dualities in sequential decision-making
arXiv:2607.18077v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: What gives the Bellman equation its form? We show that the recursive properties of optimal value functions follow from three conditions: that the dynamics decomposes through sufficient statistics, that the return decomposes recursively, and that the aggregation of uncertainty is compatible with both. When all three conditions hold on a common state, the Bellman equation arises from their mutual consistency; when one fails, tractability can often be recovered by augmenting the state or by deforming return or dynamics. The same conditions are shown to give rise to three dualities: one between probability and return, one between return and aggregation, and one between aggregation and probability. Our framework reveals these dualities as arising from a single construction, unifying methods developed separately across reinforcement learning, control, and decision theory.
Abstract:What gives the Bellman equation its form? We show that the recursive properties of optimal value functions follow from three conditions: that the dynamics decomposes through sufficient statistics, that the return decomposes recursively, and that the aggregation of uncertainty is compatible with both. When all three conditions hold on a common state, the Bellman equation arises from their mutual consistency; when one fails, tractability can often be recovered by augmenting the state or by deforming return or dynamics. The same conditions are shown to give rise to three dualities: one between probability and return, one between return and aggregation, and one between aggregation and probability. Our framework reveals these dualities as arising from a single construction, unifying methods developed separately across reinforcement learning, control, and decision theory.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.18077 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.18077v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18077 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 224 words
Related coverage
Deep Learning for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty: Foundations, Frameworks, and Frontiers
arXiv · Sep 17, 2026
A Mathematical Theory of Pragmatic Information
arXiv · Sep 12, 2026

Six Principles of Voice Design: Designing for the Ear and Encoding It into Agent Script
Salesforce Blog · Oct 8, 2026

From CUDA to MLX: How K-Search Brings Decades of Kernel Expertise to Apple Silicon
BAIR Blog · Jul 29, 2026