aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that Gaussian measurements in quantum optics can achieve superadditive precision, breaking the standard rule where independent probes are measured separately. By utilizing Bell homodyne detection with coupled resonators or phase-preserving amplifiers, the study proves a measurable gain of up to 17.157% over separate readouts when modes differ in quadrature width and frequency. These findings offer concrete pathways for optimizing quantum sensing hardware using standard linear optics components.
Gaussian Fisher Information Is Superadditive
arXiv:2610.02625v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum Fisher information adds over independent probes, so a single parameter is best measured probe by probe. We show that Gaussian measurements, the linear optics and homodyne detection of optical and microwave experiments, break this rule: two independent modes are better measured together. The uncertainty principle leaves a linear detector half of phase space, and for two modes the choice of half is a resource. Bell homodyne, a balanced beam splitter followed by two homodyne detectors, beats the best separate readout when the modes differ in quadrature width and in how the width responds to the parameter. Heterodyne detection splits a mode on a beam splitter to read both quadratures and pays one unit of vacuum noise for the empty port. Bell homodyne fills that port with the second mode, so the noise turns into signal. We prove that the gain stays below $(\sqrt2-1)^2=17.157\%$ for every parameter carried by widths. For thermal modes at one temperature, the canonical case, a gain was conjectured impossible. We prove that any frequency difference opens a temperature window and that the gain peaks at $12.699\%$ at frequency ratio $3.318$, where Bell homodyne is the optimal Gaussian measurement. Standard hardware reaches the gain: two coupled resonators with two homodyne detectors, or a phase-preserving amplifier whose idler band is fed by the same thermal source.
Abstract:Quantum Fisher information adds over independent probes, so a single parameter is best measured probe by probe. We show that Gaussian measurements, the linear optics and homodyne detection of optical and microwave experiments, break this rule: two independent modes are better measured together. The uncertainty principle leaves a linear detector half of phase space, and for two modes the choice of half is a resource. Bell homodyne, a balanced beam splitter followed by two homodyne detectors, beats the best separate readout when the modes differ in quadrature width and in how the width responds to the parameter. Heterodyne detection splits a mode on a beam splitter to read both quadratures and pays one unit of vacuum noise for the empty port. Bell homodyne fills that port with the second mode, so the noise turns into signal. We prove that the gain stays below $(\sqrt2-1)^2=17.157\%$ for every parameter carried by widths. For thermal modes at one temperature, the canonical case, a gain was conjectured impossible. We prove that any frequency difference opens a temperature window and that the gain peaks at $12.699\%$ at frequency ratio $3.318$, where Bell homodyne is the optimal Gaussian measurement. Standard hardware reaches the gain: two coupled resonators with two homodyne detectors, or a phase-preserving amplifier whose idler band is fed by the same thermal source.
arXiv:2610.02625 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.02625v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02625 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 310 words
Related coverage
Heralded Non-Gaussian Squeezed-State Inputs for Parity-Detection SU(1,1) Interferometry
arXiv · Aug 6, 2026

Researchers link quantum data limits to geometry and measurement
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 17, 2026

Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation
Quantum Journal · Aug 13, 2026
Fisher Widths: Local Learning Geometry and Anisotropic Recovery
arXiv · Jul 24, 2026