aiqbench analysis
This research investigates whether Graph Attention Networks can effectively approximate shortest paths in dynamic networks, offering a potential scalability advantage over classical Dijkstra-based algorithms like OSPF. By benchmarking the model against real-world ISP topologies, the study quantifies the trade-offs between inference speed and routing accuracy to determine if learned heuristics can generalize across diverse network structures.
GATNextHop: A GAT for Shortest Path Routing with Cross-Topology Generalization
arXiv:2608.23917v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Common shortest-path algorithms, such as Dijkstra's (SPF), that OSPF uses, provide exact routing solutions but must be recomputed for each network topology, limiting scalability in dynamic or large-scale networks. This paper proposes the GATNextHop model to determine whether a Graph Neural Network, namely the Graph Attention Network, can approximate shortest paths and generalize across topologies. By training on synthetic graphs and evaluating on real-world Internet Service Provider networks from the Internet Topology Zoo, we aim to benchmark our model's ability to learn routing heuristics that transfer across network structures. Performance will be evaluated in terms of accuracy, inference speed, and generalization, comparing the GNN against Dijkstra's algorithm to quantify trade-offs between learned and classical routing approaches.
Abstract:Common shortest-path algorithms, such as Dijkstra's (SPF), that OSPF uses, provide exact routing solutions but must be recomputed for each network topology, limiting scalability in dynamic or large-scale networks. This paper proposes the GATNextHop model to determine whether a Graph Neural Network, namely the Graph Attention Network, can approximate shortest paths and generalize across topologies. By training on synthetic graphs and evaluating on real-world Internet Service Provider networks from the Internet Topology Zoo, we aim to benchmark our model's ability to learn routing heuristics that transfer across network structures. Performance will be evaluated in terms of accuracy, inference speed, and generalization, comparing the GNN against Dijkstra's algorithm to quantify trade-offs between learned and classical routing approaches.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.23917 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.23917v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.23917 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 210 words
Related coverage

How flat is replacing fat in AWS data center networks
Amazon Science · May 28, 2026

Exploring Hierarchical Interest Representation For Meta Ads Deep Funnel Optimization
Meta Engineering · Jul 15, 2026

Giga-Scale AI and the Ethernet Evolution: How Spectrum-X Ethernet Rewrites the Rules
NVIDIA · Aug 24, 2026
DI Series: Serving Kimi-K3 MXFP4 Wide-EP Disaggregated on AMD Instinct MI300X and MI325X
AMD · Oct 8, 2026