aiqbench analysis
GAPD addresses a key limitation in agentic KBQA by shifting from sparse final-answer rewards to dense token-level guidance using gold logical forms as state anchors. This approach aligns intermediate student actions with optimal trajectories through a stop-gradient teacher mechanism, significantly improving performance on standard benchmarks like WebQSP and GrailQA. The method effectively repurposes existing gold annotations for on-policy RL updates rather than just data construction, offering a practical path to more robust agentic reasoning.
GAPD: Gold-Action Policy Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning in Knowledge Base Question Answering
arXiv:2605.29584v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) is a natural fit for agentic knowledge base question answering (KBQA), where a model must issue executable actions, observe knowledge-base feedback, and eventually return an answer. However, current RL-based KBQA systems mainly optimize sparse rewards from the final answer, leaving intermediate action errors weakly supervised. This is especially limiting for logical-form annotated KBQA benchmarks: gold logical forms can be converted into executable action sequences, but existing pipelines use them mainly for warm-start data construction rather than for on-policy RL updates. We propose GAPD, a training-time Gold-Action Policy Distillation framework that adds dense token-level guidance to outcome-based RL. To align gold actions with on-policy student rollouts, GAPD uses MID-ANCHOR MATCHING: it treats the intermediate entities reached during student exploration and gold execution as state anchors, and matches student states to gold states through these explored entity sets. The current policy conditioned on this aligned gold action serves as a stop-gradient teacher, whose token distribution is distilled back to the ordinary student policy over generated action-token spans. GAPD consistently surpasses the current state of the art on WebQSP, GrailQA, and GraphQ.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) is a natural fit for agentic knowledge base question answering (KBQA), where a model must issue executable actions, observe knowledge-base feedback, and eventually return an answer. However, current RL-based KBQA systems mainly optimize sparse rewards from the final answer, leaving intermediate action errors weakly supervised. This is especially limiting for logical-form annotated KBQA benchmarks: gold logical forms can be converted into executable action sequences, but existing pipelines use them mainly for warm-start data construction rather than for on-policy RL updates. We propose GAPD, a training-time Gold-Action Policy Distillation framework that adds dense token-level guidance to outcome-based RL. To align gold actions with on-policy student rollouts, GAPD uses MID-ANCHOR MATCHING: it treats the intermediate entities reached during student exploration and gold execution as state anchors, and matches student states to gold states through these explored entity sets. The current policy conditioned on this aligned gold action serves as a stop-gradient teacher, whose token distribution is distilled back to the ordinary student policy over generated action-token spans. GAPD consistently surpasses the current state of the art on WebQSP, GrailQA, and GraphQ.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2605.29584 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2605.29584v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29584 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 275 words
Related coverage

The generative AI customization spectrum: From prompt engineering to custom models on AWS
AWS · Sep 14, 2026

Continual learning might make your blocking monitors nearly useless
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 24, 2026
HindSearch: Trajectory-Level Hindsight Critique for Search-Augmented Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · Aug 5, 2026
Vision-Language-Action Jump-Starting for Reinforcement Learning Robotic Agents
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026