aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces fxBench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate machine learning models on proactive formula suggestions within real-world spreadsheets. The study decomposes the task into four core capabilities—context gathering, understanding, intent recognition, and formula generation—and demonstrates that even advanced models struggle with accuracy, achieving only 58.8% success in generating correct suggestions. By analyzing failure modes and testing dense context representations, the work highlights critical bottlenecks for improving agentic productivity tools in ubiquitous office environments.
fxBench: Evaluating and Understanding Formula Suggestions in Spreadsheets
arXiv:2610.24729v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Spreadsheets are among the most widely used tools for computations, and formulas are their core building blocks. Besides agentic spreadsheet tools, proactive formula suggestions enable significant productivity gains and are now available in popular spreadsheet software (Microsoft Excel and Google Sheets). Such suggestions pose interesting challenges: the right context must be collected and represented for a machine learning model, which must then be able to write a correct formula, in a way that is fast and cheap enough to trigger on every = (or subsequent keystrokes for auto-completion) without taking users out of their editing flow. Surprisingly, there is no public benchmark for formula suggestions on real spreadsheets. In this paper, we therefore (1) introduce fxBench as a manually curated benchmark of 503 formula suggestion tasks based on Sheetpedia, (2) break down the formula suggestion problem into four capabilities (gather context, understand context, understand intent, write formula) that a formula suggestion system requires, and (3) evaluate existing and new approaches to understand bottlenecks in these capabilities that pose interesting research directions. Specifically, we annotate each benchmark with the cells that describe intent to determine the theoretical performance limit of a given context selection strategy, we evaluate performance of small and large models on different representations of context, including a dense format with high theoretical coverage at low token counts, and we fine-tune smaller language models to show that we can learn to understand such dense formats. Additionally, we perform quantitative and qualitative analysis on failure modes to understand bottlenecks in the formula writing capability; the best configuration only achieved 58.8% correct suggestions.
Abstract:Spreadsheets are among the most widely used tools for computations, and formulas are their core building blocks. Besides agentic spreadsheet tools, proactive formula suggestions enable significant productivity gains and are now available in popular spreadsheet software (Microsoft Excel and Google Sheets). Such suggestions pose interesting challenges: the right context must be collected and represented for a machine learning model, which must then be able to write a correct formula, in a way that is fast and cheap enough to trigger on every = (or subsequent keystrokes for auto-completion) without taking users out of their editing flow. Surprisingly, there is no public benchmark for formula suggestions on real spreadsheets. In this paper, we therefore (1) introduce fxBench as a manually curated benchmark of 503 formula suggestion tasks based on Sheetpedia, (2) break down the formula suggestion problem into four capabilities (gather context, understand context, understand intent, write formula) that a formula suggestion system requires, and (3) evaluate existing and new approaches to understand bottlenecks in these capabilities that pose interesting research directions. Specifically, we annotate each benchmark with the cells that describe intent to determine the theoretical performance limit of a given context selection strategy, we evaluate performance of small and large models on different representations of context, including a dense format with high theoretical coverage at low token counts, and we fine-tune smaller language models to show that we can learn to understand such dense formats. Additionally, we perform quantitative and qualitative analysis on failure modes to understand bottlenecks in the formula writing capability; the best configuration only achieved 58.8% correct suggestions.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.24729 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.24729v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.24729 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 356 words
Related coverage
Sheet As Token: A Graph-Enhanced Representation for Multi-Sheet Spreadsheet Understanding
arXiv · Jul 29, 2026
Structured Prediction for Scalable Spreadsheet Table Understanding: From Cell Types to Table Ranges (Extended Version)
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026
Exclusive: Cfo.ai launches an agentic CFO for business founders
SiliconANGLE · Sep 10, 2026

Who Will Actually Use Quantum Computers? Study Identifies 11 User Types
The Quantum Insider · Aug 21, 2026