Functional compatibility as a determinant of persistent neural learning

arXiv:2608.22462v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial neural networks can acquire new capabilities but often damage existing ones when they continue to learn. This stability-plasticity problem has motivated replay, regularization and constrained-update methods, yet it remains unclear whether a property of incoming learning itself determines what can be retained without disrupting protected behaviour. Here we show that functional compatibility, the extent to which new learning can coexist with behaviour that must be preserved, is a causal determinant of persistent learning. To our knowledge, this is the first controlled causal demonstration in which compatibility is deliberately changed from matched neural states and persistent learning is measured under a common retention requirement. The effect generalizes across independent learning directions, convolutional and transformer architectures, vision and text, and additional seeds. Learning rules differ in how efficiently they exploit available compatibility, while retention constraints limit how much can be stored. At larger finite updates, nonlinear geometry changes the available learning opportunity and ultimately prevents the matched compatibility continuum from being realized. These results establish functional compatibility as an experimentally controllable principle of persistent neural learning, shifting the problem from preventing forgetting towards identifying which components of new learning can safely become permanent.

Abstract:Artificial neural networks can acquire new capabilities but often damage existing ones when they continue to learn. This stability-plasticity problem has motivated replay, regularization and constrained-update methods, yet it remains unclear whether a property of incoming learning itself determines what can be retained without disrupting protected behaviour. Here we show that functional compatibility, the extent to which new learning can coexist with behaviour that must be preserved, is a causal determinant of persistent learning. To our knowledge, this is the first controlled causal demonstration in which compatibility is deliberately changed from matched neural states and persistent learning is measured under a common retention requirement. The effect generalizes across independent learning directions, convolutional and transformer architectures, vision and text, and additional seeds. Learning rules differ in how efficiently they exploit available compatibility, while retention constraints limit how much can be stored. At larger finite updates, nonlinear geometry changes the available learning opportunity and ultimately prevents the matched compatibility continuum from being realized. These results establish functional compatibility as an experimentally controllable principle of persistent neural learning, shifting the problem from preventing forgetting towards identifying which components of new learning can safely become permanent.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.22462 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.22462v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.22462 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Functional compatibility as a determinant of persistent neural learning

Related coverage