aiqbench analysis
This study provides a rigorous cross-model evaluation of frontier LLMs for robot control, revealing distinct strengths in instruction following versus physical manipulation across GPT-6, Claude Opus, and Gemini 4. The findings highlight a persistent gap between high-level task understanding and reliable embodied execution, while also demonstrating how control harness design significantly impacts planning costs and success rates.
Frontier LLMs Enter the World of Robotics: A Cross-Model Evaluation on RoboColiseum
arXiv:2610.27865v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent studies have explored the potential of multimodal large language models for robot control, yet the models' embodied capabilities remain insufficiently characterized across models, tasks, and execution settings. We conduct a multidimensional comparative evaluation on RoboColiseum across four tracks: Instruction Following, Spatial Reasoning, General Manipulation, and Robustness. We implement Agent2Act, a control harness that integrates GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5, and Gemini 4 Argon into the evaluation environment through shared observation, action execution, and feedback interfaces. Under common task settings and scoring criteria, all four models exhibit a consistent capability profile: high instruction-following scores, with three approaching perfect performance; strong spatial reasoning; and general manipulation scores below those of the other three tracks. Within the evaluated configurations, Astra leads instruction following and robustness, while Opus leads spatial reasoning, general manipulation, and overall performance. These results reveal complementary strengths across models and a persistent gap between task understanding and reliable physical execution. Component comparisons on selected tasks further show that harness design affects task success, planning cost, and execution time. Additionally, case studies with Astra examine whole-body coordination, manipulation across robot embodiments, precision manipulation, dexterous-hand manipulation, and real-robot tasks, providing further insight into the model's capabilities and limitations across embodied tasks.
Abstract:Recent studies have explored the potential of multimodal large language models for robot control, yet the models' embodied capabilities remain insufficiently characterized across models, tasks, and execution settings. We conduct a multidimensional comparative evaluation on RoboColiseum across four tracks: Instruction Following, Spatial Reasoning, General Manipulation, and Robustness. We implement Agent2Act, a control harness that integrates GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5, and Gemini 4 Argon into the evaluation environment through shared observation, action execution, and feedback interfaces. Under common task settings and scoring criteria, all four models exhibit a consistent capability profile: high instruction-following scores, with three approaching perfect performance; strong spatial reasoning; and general manipulation scores below those of the other three tracks. Within the evaluated configurations, Astra leads instruction following and robustness, while Opus leads spatial reasoning, general manipulation, and overall performance. These results reveal complementary strengths across models and a persistent gap between task understanding and reliable physical execution. Component comparisons on selected tasks further show that harness design affects task success, planning cost, and execution time. Additionally, case studies with Astra examine whole-body coordination, manipulation across robot embodiments, precision manipulation, dexterous-hand manipulation, and real-robot tasks, providing further insight into the model's capabilities and limitations across embodied tasks.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2610.27865 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.27865v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.27865 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words