Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates causal information flow in Vision-Language Models by applying layer-wise interventions to video-text attention pathways, revealing how visual evidence grounds final linguistic decisions. The study highlights that nouns act as semantic anchors during multimodal enrichment while verbs drive temporal reasoning, though it notes inherent fragility in reconstructing sequential information across video frames. These findings offer critical insights into the internal mechanics and limitations of current VLMs regarding spatial, causal, and temporal visual reasoning.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

From Vision to Language: Investigating Causal Information Flow in Multimodal Decision-Making

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.05149v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-Language Models are commonly evaluated through their final predictions, but understanding whether these decisions are grounded in visual evidence requires tracing how visual information contributes to language-based decisions. With this purpose in mind, we investigate cross-modal information flow in a video-based generative multiple-choice-like setting by applying a layer-wise causal intervention on video-text attention pathways. We target spatial, causal, and temporal visual reasoning. Our results show that visual information is mainly integrated while the model processes the candidate answer options, which serve as the primary textual grounding sites for the final decision. We further show that nouns play an important role as semantic anchors during multimodal enrichment, while verbs are more relevant when temporal relations are processed. Finally, we identify a distinct pattern in temporal reasoning, suggesting that VLMs struggle to reconstruct sequential information across video frames, but we remark that such fragility may also reflect linguistic biases associated with specific temporal expressions used for defining the relation between events within a scene.

Abstract:Vision-Language Models are commonly evaluated through their final predictions, but understanding whether these decisions are grounded in visual evidence requires tracing how visual information contributes to language-based decisions. With this purpose in mind, we investigate cross-modal information flow in a video-based generative multiple-choice-like setting by applying a layer-wise causal intervention on video-text attention pathways. We target spatial, causal, and temporal visual reasoning. Our results show that visual information is mainly integrated while the model processes the candidate answer options, which serve as the primary textual grounding sites for the final decision. We further show that nouns play an important role as semantic anchors during multimodal enrichment, while verbs are more relevant when temporal relations are processed. Finally, we identify a distinct pattern in temporal reasoning, suggesting that VLMs struggle to reconstruct sequential information across video frames, but we remark that such fragility may also reflect linguistic biases associated with specific temporal expressions used for defining the relation between events within a scene.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2609.05149 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.05149v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05149 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 263 words

Related coverage