Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper addresses object hallucination in large vision-language models by introducing EGVCA, a training-free method that admits semantic claims only when supported by visual evidence. By comparing claim likelihoods against visual-null inputs, the approach effectively reduces false detections while maintaining caption quality across multiple benchmarks and model backbones. The work offers a practical alternative to token-level correction strategies for improving the reliability of multimodal AI systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

From Token Correction to Claim Admission: Training-Free Hallucination Mitigation for Large Vision-Language Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.17706v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large vision-language models often exhibit object hallucination, generating claims that are not supported by the input image. To mitigate this issue, we propose Evidence-Guided Visual Claim Admission (EGVCA), a training-free framework that admits a semantic claim only when it receives sufficient image-dependent support. EGVCA measures this support by comparing the claim likelihood under the observed image and a visual-null input. For captioning, it controls semantic expansion without altering token generation. For binary visual question answering, it combines atomic visual support with the image-induced change in the model's native Yes--No margin. Experiments on CHAIR, POPE, and MME across three LVLM backbones show that EGVCA substantially reduces object hallucination while preserving caption quality. It achieves the highest POPE F1 in eight of nine backbone--sampling settings and improves the native MME total score on all three backbones. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of claim-level admission as a simple alternative to token-level distribution correction.

Abstract:Large vision-language models often exhibit object hallucination, generating claims that are not supported by the input image. To mitigate this issue, we propose Evidence-Guided Visual Claim Admission (EGVCA), a training-free framework that admits a semantic claim only when it receives sufficient image-dependent support. EGVCA measures this support by comparing the claim likelihood under the observed image and a visual-null input. For captioning, it controls semantic expansion without altering token generation. For binary visual question answering, it combines atomic visual support with the image-induced change in the model's native Yes--No margin. Experiments on CHAIR, POPE, and MME across three LVLM backbones show that EGVCA substantially reduces object hallucination while preserving caption quality. It achieves the highest POPE F1 in eight of nine backbone--sampling settings and improves the native MME total score on all three backbones. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of claim-level admission as a simple alternative to token-level distribution correction.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.17706 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.17706v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17706 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words

Related coverage