Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the implicit bias in Muon optimization, demonstrating that practical implementation details like finite Newton-Schulz iterations cause it to converge to the Frobenius max-margin direction rather than the spectral one predicted for idealized orthogonalization. By quantifying how these perturbations affect parameter trajectories and identifying conditions under which spectral bias can be recovered, the work offers critical insights for researchers designing second-order optimization algorithms in machine learning.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

From Spectral to Frobenius: When Muon Loses Its Spectral Implicit Bias

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.20112v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prior work on implicit bias shows that gradient descent selects the Frobenius max-margin direction on linearly separable problems, whereas Fan et al. (2025) established spectral max-margin behavior for spectral-norm steepest descent methods, including idealized Muon with exact orthogonalization. In practice, however, Muon approximates orthogonalization using finite Newton-Schulz iterations and a positive stabilization constant. We prove that these implementation choices cause Muon to select the Frobenius rather than the spectral max-margin direction in linear classification with separable data. We also establish this behavior for both exponential moving average and Nesterov-style momentum. The key technical ingredient is a summable perturbation argument showing that the resulting parameter trajectories remain at bounded distance from those of gradient descent. We then disentangle the roles of Newton-Schulz iteration count, the stabilization constant, and the Newton-Schulz polynomial, revealing distinct asymptotic behaviors, including directions that achieve neither Frobenius nor spectral max-margin. Finally, we show that Muon can recover its spectral max-margin bias with Newton-Schulz iterations growing logarithmically over training.

Abstract:Prior work on implicit bias shows that gradient descent selects the Frobenius max-margin direction on linearly separable problems, whereas Fan et al. (2025) established spectral max-margin behavior for spectral-norm steepest descent methods, including idealized Muon with exact orthogonalization. In practice, however, Muon approximates orthogonalization using finite Newton-Schulz iterations and a positive stabilization constant. We prove that these implementation choices cause Muon to select the Frobenius rather than the spectral max-margin direction in linear classification with separable data. We also establish this behavior for both exponential moving average and Nesterov-style momentum. The key technical ingredient is a summable perturbation argument showing that the resulting parameter trajectories remain at bounded distance from those of gradient descent. We then disentangle the roles of Newton-Schulz iteration count, the stabilization constant, and the Newton-Schulz polynomial, revealing distinct asymptotic behaviors, including directions that achieve neither Frobenius nor spectral max-margin. Finally, we show that Muon can recover its spectral max-margin bias with Newton-Schulz iterations growing logarithmically over training.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.20112 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.20112v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20112 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words

Related coverage