aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates how Path Integral Stochastic Gradient Descent (PISGD) can mathematically inherit quantum tunneling scaling properties, allowing classical optimizers to escape local minima more efficiently than standard noise-driven methods in specific barrier configurations. By adapting Kramers' escape-rate theory to path space, the study confirms that this enhanced performance stems from the bounce action rather than barrier height, though it notes the absence of coherence among multiple tunneling paths. The findings suggest a potential bridge between quantum-inspired classical algorithms and genuine quantum optimization without requiring full quantum hardware.
From Quantum Tunneling to Classical Optimization through Instantons
arXiv:2610.06797v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We use an instanton-based analysis to show that Path Integral Stochastic Gradient Descent (PISGD), a classical optimization algorithm instantiated from path integral Monte Carlo (PIMC), can inherit the quantum tunneling mechanism. Quantum tunneling is the phenomenon in which a quantum particle passes through a potential barrier that a classical trajectory cannot cross in the same way. This mechanism can contribute to the performance of quantum optimization algorithms, since a common bottleneck in optimization is that the solution becomes trapped in a local minimum, separated from better solutions by a potential barrier. Classical noise-driven optimizers, such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD), have escape times that scale exponentially with the potential barrier height. For quantum tunneling, the escape time is instead exponential in the bounce action, which equals twice the Agmon distance between the two basins. When the barrier is tall but thin, quantum tunneling can allow escaping local minima faster than such classical methods. Remarkably, this scaling is not exclusive to algorithms with genuine quantum dynamics. For PISGD applied to classical nonconvex global optimization, we adapt Kramers' escape-rate theory to path space and obtain the same exponential scaling as quantum tunneling, in terms of the bounce action rather than the barrier height. We confirm this scaling numerically by implementing PISGD for both separable and nonseparable potentials. That said, PISGD retains only incoherent tunneling, since coherence among multiple tunneling paths is absent. Our analysis therefore does not rule out a potential quantum advantage for quantum-tunneling-based algorithms over classical ones in general.
Abstract:We use an instanton-based analysis to show that Path Integral Stochastic Gradient Descent (PISGD), a classical optimization algorithm instantiated from path integral Monte Carlo (PIMC), can inherit the quantum tunneling mechanism. Quantum tunneling is the phenomenon in which a quantum particle passes through a potential barrier that a classical trajectory cannot cross in the same way. This mechanism can contribute to the performance of quantum optimization algorithms, since a common bottleneck in optimization is that the solution becomes trapped in a local minimum, separated from better solutions by a potential barrier. Classical noise-driven optimizers, such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD), have escape times that scale exponentially with the potential barrier height. For quantum tunneling, the escape time is instead exponential in the bounce action, which equals twice the Agmon distance between the two basins. When the barrier is tall but thin, quantum tunneling can allow escaping local minima faster than such classical methods. Remarkably, this scaling is not exclusive to algorithms with genuine quantum dynamics. For PISGD applied to classical nonconvex global optimization, we adapt Kramers' escape-rate theory to path space and obtain the same exponential scaling as quantum tunneling, in terms of the bounce action rather than the barrier height. We confirm this scaling numerically by implementing PISGD for both separable and nonseparable potentials. That said, PISGD retains only incoherent tunneling, since coherence among multiple tunneling paths is absent. Our analysis therefore does not rule out a potential quantum advantage for quantum-tunneling-based algorithms over classical ones in general.
arXiv:2610.06797 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.06797v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06797 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 340 words
Related coverage

The Companies Building Quantum Computing Chips in 2026
The Quantum Insider · Jun 5, 2026
Quantum Simulation of Energy Bifurcation and Z_2-Symmetry Restoration in Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Monte Carlo simulations model complex quantum interactions
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 24, 2026