Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research presents an adaptive framework demonstrating significant vulnerabilities in both cascaded pipelines and end-to-end large audio-language models against voice-based jailbreak attacks. By utilizing a feedback-guided mutation engine to refine textual prompts and acoustic perturbations simultaneously, the study reveals that current architectural paradigms remain substantially susceptible to adversarial inputs across diverse systems. The findings underscore critical gaps in the security posture of emerging audio AI applications before they reach widespread deployment.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

`From Prompt to Perturbation': An Adaptive Framework for Voice-Based Jailbreaks on Audio LLMs

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2502.00735v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into audio-based applications, growing concerns have emerged regarding their vulnerability to audio-based adversarial attacks. These systems typically follow two architectural paradigms: cascaded pipelines, where automatic speech recognition converts audio inputs into text before LLM processing, and end-to-end large audio-language models (LALMs), which directly interpret raw audio signals. Beyond architectural differences, cascaded pipelines are primarily vulnerable to text-level jailbreak strategies delivered through speech, whereas end-to-end LALMs introduce additional acoustic-semantic attack vectors. However, existing studies often focus on a single paradigm and provide limited coverage of the broader audio attack space. To bridge this gap, we propose an adaptive jailbreak attack framework for systematic evaluation of both cascaded pipelines and LALMs under a unified experimental setting. At its core, the framework uses a feedback-guided mutation engine to automatically generate and refine jailbreak candidates across both textual prompts and audio perturbations, thereby expanding attack diversity and coverage. Experiments on six representative audio-based systems demonstrate that both paradigms remain substantially vulnerable to audio jailbreak attacks. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, our framework achieves consistently higher attack success rates across diverse audio-based LLM systems.

Abstract:As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into audio-based applications, growing concerns have emerged regarding their vulnerability to audio-based adversarial attacks. These systems typically follow two architectural paradigms: cascaded pipelines, where automatic speech recognition converts audio inputs into text before LLM processing, and end-to-end large audio-language models (LALMs), which directly interpret raw audio signals. Beyond architectural differences, cascaded pipelines are primarily vulnerable to text-level jailbreak strategies delivered through speech, whereas end-to-end LALMs introduce additional acoustic-semantic attack vectors. However, existing studies often focus on a single paradigm and provide limited coverage of the broader audio attack space. To bridge this gap, we propose an adaptive jailbreak attack framework for systematic evaluation of both cascaded pipelines and LALMs under a unified experimental setting. At its core, the framework uses a feedback-guided mutation engine to automatically generate and refine jailbreak candidates across both textual prompts and audio perturbations, thereby expanding attack diversity and coverage. Experiments on six representative audio-based systems demonstrate that both paradigms remain substantially vulnerable to audio jailbreak attacks. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, our framework achieves consistently higher attack success rates across diverse audio-based LLM systems.

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2502.00735 [cs.CR]

(or arXiv:2502.00735v4 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.00735 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words

Related coverage