Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

The paper introduces P³IBench, a benchmark that tests whether video-language models can anticipate needs and decide when to intervene, not just describe what they see. Its main finding is that the 12 evaluated models struggle with well-calibrated response timing, and a 4B model trained on added proactive data improves some tasks unevenly. For readers building assistants, the result suggests that restraint and timing are separate capabilities that current multimodal models don't yet handle reliably.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

From Perception to Prediction and Intervention: Benchmarking Proactive Video Assistants in Real-Life Scenarios

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.21568v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent multimodal large language models have advanced video understanding, but existing benchmarks mainly evaluate whether models can interpret observed visual content. In real-world scenarios, assistants must additionally anticipate what assistance is needed and decide when to provide it. To address this gap, we introduce \textsc{P$^3$IBench}, a benchmark for proactive video understanding in real-life streaming scenarios. It evaluates three complementary capabilities: daily perception, risk prediction and intervention. We benchmark 12 representative open-source and proprietary video-language models, including streaming and adapted non-streaming systems. Our evaluation shows that current models struggle to make well-calibrated response decisions. Finally, we construct additional proactive training data and train \textsc{P$^3$I-Assistant-4B}, achieving improvements on several tasks, though gains remain uneven across capabilities. Together, these findings show that effective proactive assistance requires not only visual understanding, but also precise response timing and appropriate restraint.

Abstract:Recent multimodal large language models have advanced video understanding, but existing benchmarks mainly evaluate whether models can interpret observed visual content. In real-world scenarios, assistants must additionally anticipate what assistance is needed and decide when to provide it. To address this gap, we introduce \textsc{P$^3$IBench}, a benchmark for proactive video understanding in real-life streaming scenarios. It evaluates three complementary capabilities: daily perception, risk prediction and intervention. We benchmark 12 representative open-source and proprietary video-language models, including streaming and adapted non-streaming systems. Our evaluation shows that current models struggle to make well-calibrated response decisions. Finally, we construct additional proactive training data and train \textsc{P$^3$I-Assistant-4B}, achieving improvements on several tasks, though gains remain uneven across capabilities. Together, these findings show that effective proactive assistance requires not only visual understanding, but also precise response timing and appropriate restraint.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.21568 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.21568v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21568 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 229 words

Related coverage