aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates the feasibility of adapting a general-purpose LLM to function as a persistent editor for symbolic music scores, shifting from one-shot generation to iterative revision workflows. By fine-tuning with operation-aware dialogue records, the model achieves near-perfect compliance with specific editing constraints like chord addition and transposition while maintaining structural integrity. The study validates that large language models can serve as reusable operators over evolving artifacts rather than just standalone content generators.
From One-Shot Generation to Incremental Music Composition: Adapting a General-Purpose Instruction LLM for Persistent Symbolic Editing
arXiv:2609.34994v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Most music-generation systems are still framed and evaluated primarily as producers of complete outputs, whereas composition often proceeds through successive revisions to a shared musical artifact. This paper studies a different use of a general-purpose instruction-following large language model: not as a one-shot music generator, but as a reusable operator over an evolving symbolic score. We formulate incremental composition as a sequence of operation-aware state transitions over persistent ABC notation, with explicit requirements on what each operation may change and what it must preserve. The interaction includes two artifact-initialization variants and three editing operations -- chord addition, inpainting, and transposition. We instantiate the formulation by adapting Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) on 496,038 operation-aware dialogue records derived from Irish traditional music. The comparison with the unadapted model is used to test the feasibility of learning this interaction contract, not to claim novelty for fine-tuning itself. Across 500 dialogues per model (1,750 attempted output states), checker admission rises from 29.37% to 99.37%, while compliance conditional on admission rises from 0.7205 to 0.9798. Strict eligibility for reference-relative musical-feature analysis increases from 14 to 1,548 outputs, and Longest Common Subsequence analysis does not show a systematic increase in high-overlap sequences relative to held-out baselines under the specified protocol. The results support the technical feasibility of persistent, operation-aware symbolic editing with a general-purpose instruction LLM. They do not establish superior musical quality or human-AI co-creativity, which remain questions for musician-centered evaluation.
Abstract:Most music-generation systems are still framed and evaluated primarily as producers of complete outputs, whereas composition often proceeds through successive revisions to a shared musical artifact. This paper studies a different use of a general-purpose instruction-following large language model: not as a one-shot music generator, but as a reusable operator over an evolving symbolic score. We formulate incremental composition as a sequence of operation-aware state transitions over persistent ABC notation, with explicit requirements on what each operation may change and what it must preserve. The interaction includes two artifact-initialization variants and three editing operations -- chord addition, inpainting, and transposition. We instantiate the formulation by adapting Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) on 496,038 operation-aware dialogue records derived from Irish traditional music. The comparison with the unadapted model is used to test the feasibility of learning this interaction contract, not to claim novelty for fine-tuning itself. Across 500 dialogues per model (1,750 attempted output states), checker admission rises from 29.37% to 99.37%, while compliance conditional on admission rises from 0.7205 to 0.9798. Strict eligibility for reference-relative musical-feature analysis increases from 14 to 1,548 outputs, and Longest Common Subsequence analysis does not show a systematic increase in high-overlap sequences relative to held-out baselines under the specified protocol. The results support the technical feasibility of persistent, operation-aware symbolic editing with a general-purpose instruction LLM. They do not establish superior musical quality or human-AI co-creativity, which remain questions for musician-centered evaluation.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.34994 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.34994v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34994 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 337 words
