Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates the internal mechanisms of vision-language models by analyzing how they integrate visual and textual cues to form safety judgments. The study introduces SSU-Bench, a dataset designed to trace causal pathways between input modifications and model decisions across decoder layers. These findings clarify where specific safety verdicts become accessible within the network architecture, distinguishing between raw model outputs and accurate ethical evaluations.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

From Local Evidence to Safety Verdicts: Causal Tracing in Vision-Language Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.07514v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A vision-language model may need to combine an image with a prompt to recognize a safety risk that neither reveals alone. Where does this joint safety judgment become accessible inside the model? We introduce SSU-Bench, a dataset of matched safe and unsafe image-text combinations constructed using single-item prompt edits or image edits with annotated intended regions. Using three vision-language models, we transfer internal states between paired inputs and measure the resulting change in the safety verdict. Across models and both types of counterfactual, interventions at the changed input positions are effective in earlier decoder layers, while interventions at the final input token become effective later. Directions estimated from other examples produce similar late-layer effects. A linear readout of the final-token state also predicts the model's own verdict, including incorrect judgments, and cross-model comparisons reveal similarities in the patterns of counterfactual change. These findings identify a recurring transition in where interventions can influence a joint safety verdict and distinguish a readable model decision from a correct safety judgment.

Abstract:A vision-language model may need to combine an image with a prompt to recognize a safety risk that neither reveals alone. Where does this joint safety judgment become accessible inside the model? We introduce SSU-Bench, a dataset of matched safe and unsafe image-text combinations constructed using single-item prompt edits or image edits with annotated intended regions. Using three vision-language models, we transfer internal states between paired inputs and measure the resulting change in the safety verdict. Across models and both types of counterfactual, interventions at the changed input positions are effective in earlier decoder layers, while interventions at the final input token become effective later. Directions estimated from other examples produce similar late-layer effects. A linear readout of the final-token state also predicts the model's own verdict, including incorrect judgments, and cross-model comparisons reveal similarities in the patterns of counterfactual change. These findings identify a recurring transition in where interventions can influence a joint safety verdict and distinguish a readable model decision from a correct safety judgment.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.07514 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.07514v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07514 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage