aiqbench analysis
This research proposes a novel data-selection strategy that leverages a model's internal features to identify critical prediction errors, outperforming existing rarity-based methods in improving object detection performance. By allowing the target model's current state to guide labeling decisions without relying on external signals or labels for candidates, this approach optimizes training efficiency under limited annotation budgets.
From internal representations to model improvement through prediction errors
arXiv:2609.35449v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With limited annotation budgets, choosing which images to label determines how much a model improves. Data-selection methods that use features from a separately trained model, or scene descriptions written by vision-language models, have been successful, but those signals do not directly capture changes in the model being improved. The target model's own internal features reflect what it has learned so far and change with retraining, making them a natural cue for choosing the next training data. However, feature rarity alone does not reveal the errors that matter for performance. Here we link internal features to prediction errors and their expected impact on performance and select images for labeling and retraining without using labels for candidate images. We evaluated the method with an object detector on two datasets and two pairs of random seeds. Adding internal features improved the identification of prediction errors in 15 of 16 conditions. When performance was averaged over successive labeling rounds, the method outperformed selection based only on feature rarity in all four evaluation settings and ranked among the top two of six methods. With other conditions held fixed, performance after retraining was again higher than with rarity-based selection, even though the latter collected more errors. With longer retraining, the proposed method ranked first among six methods. These results suggest that linking a model's internal features to its errors and their effects on performance may help select training images that improve performance, thereby allowing the model's current state to guide which images are labeled next.
Abstract:With limited annotation budgets, choosing which images to label determines how much a model improves. Data-selection methods that use features from a separately trained model, or scene descriptions written by vision-language models, have been successful, but those signals do not directly capture changes in the model being improved. The target model's own internal features reflect what it has learned so far and change with retraining, making them a natural cue for choosing the next training data. However, feature rarity alone does not reveal the errors that matter for performance. Here we link internal features to prediction errors and their expected impact on performance and select images for labeling and retraining without using labels for candidate images. We evaluated the method with an object detector on two datasets and two pairs of random seeds. Adding internal features improved the identification of prediction errors in 15 of 16 conditions. When performance was averaged over successive labeling rounds, the method outperformed selection based only on feature rarity in all four evaluation settings and ranked among the top two of six methods. With other conditions held fixed, performance after retraining was again higher than with rarity-based selection, even though the latter collected more errors. With longer retraining, the proposed method ranked first among six methods. These results suggest that linking a model's internal features to its errors and their effects on performance may help select training images that improve performance, thereby allowing the model's current state to guide which images are labeled next.
27 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. Supplementary Information is provided as an ancillary file
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.35449 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.35449v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35449 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Supplementary_Information.pdf
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 364 words
Related coverage
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026
Models Can't Remember Their Training. Neither Can You.
LessWrong · Jul 19, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026