aiqbench analysis
This paper provides a rigorous non-asymptotic convergence analysis for score-based generative models driven by $\alpha$-stable Lévy processes, establishing that they uniquely capture heavy-tailed distributions where traditional Brownian dynamics fail. By proving exponential decay of initialization errors and identifying tail-index matching as the critical mechanism, the work offers essential theoretical guarantees for modeling extreme events in complex data.
From Global to Tail Convergence: Dynamics of $\alpha$-Stable Score-Based Generative Models
arXiv:2610.19773v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Score-based generative models driven by $\alpha$-stable L{\'e}vy processes have been proposed as an alternative to Brownian diffusion models, with empirical evidence suggesting improved sampling and better modeling of heavy-tailed data. Yet theoretical guarantees for these models remain limited. We develop a non-asymptotic convergence analysis for scale-preserving $\alpha$-stable generative dynamics, covering both compactly supported and power-law targets. In p-Wasserstein distance, we quantify the effects of early stopping, initialization, score approximation, and time discretization, and show exponential decay of the initialization error. A comparison with Brownian dynamics reveals that global Wasserstein convergence alone does not fundamentally distinguish the two models: both initialization errors decay exponentially with the forward horizon on the common class of heavy-tailed targets. A sharp separation emerges instead in the tails. At any positive generation time, stable dynamics produces power-law tails with index $\alpha$, whereas Brownian dynamics remains light-tailed. For a target with tail index $\nu$, asymptotically correct extreme-quantile scaling is possible precisely when $\alpha$=$\nu$. These results identify tail-index matching as a principled mechanism behind the ability of stable generative models to capture extreme events.
Abstract:Score-based generative models driven by $\alpha$-stable L{é}vy processes have been proposed as an alternative to Brownian diffusion models, with empirical evidence suggesting improved sampling and better modeling of heavy-tailed data. Yet theoretical guarantees for these models remain limited. We develop a non-asymptotic convergence analysis for scale-preserving $\alpha$-stable generative dynamics, covering both compactly supported and power-law targets. In p-Wasserstein distance, we quantify the effects of early stopping, initialization, score approximation, and time discretization, and show exponential decay of the initialization error. A comparison with Brownian dynamics reveals that global Wasserstein convergence alone does not fundamentally distinguish the two models: both initialization errors decay exponentially with the forward horizon on the common class of heavy-tailed targets. A sharp separation emerges instead in the tails. At any positive generation time, stable dynamics produces power-law tails with index $\alpha$, whereas Brownian dynamics remains light-tailed. For a target with tail index $\nu$, asymptotically correct extreme-quantile scaling is possible precisely when $\alpha$=$\nu$. These results identify tail-index matching as a principled mechanism behind the ability of stable generative models to capture extreme events.
44 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables. Code: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Probability (math.PR); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2610.19773 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.19773v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19773 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words
Related coverage
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 11, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Enabling Language-specific Reasoning in Multilingual Models with Reinforcement Learning
AMD · Jul 24, 2026

The art and science of hyperparameter optimization on Amazon Nova Forge
AWS · Jun 2, 2026