Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates that row-wise normalization can provably outperform standard optimizers like Adam and Muon in high-dimensional multiclass classification by better preserving population decision-boundary directions. The study provides theoretical justification under various data models, including isotropic Gaussian clouds and anisotropic noise, while also validating findings with synthetic data and last-layer language model experiments. This work advances the understanding of how optimizer geometry influences generalization performance beyond mere convergence speed.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

From Geometry to Generalization: Why Row Normalization Can Beat Adam and Muon

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.11309v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Different optimizers can fit the same training data while selecting classifiers with substantially different geometries, but whether this difference provably affects population performance remains unclear. We show that row-wise normalization can achieve strictly higher population accuracy than full-batch Adam, a proxy for random-reshuffling Adam, and exact-SVD Muon in high-dimensional multiclass classification. Under an isotropic Gaussian-cloud data model, this advantage arises because row normalization's class-wise Euclidean geometry asymptotically preserves the population decision-boundary directions, whereas Adam's coordinate-wise geometry and Muon's spectral geometry introduce nonvanishing distortions. Beyond isotropy, the advantage persists for full-batch training on class means with independently oriented class-mean and test-noise covariances. It holds for power-law spectra with class-mean exponent below one, even under heavily anisotropic test noise. When both covariances are diagonal and sufficiently close, the advantage over Adam can reverse, while applying the same random rotation to both restores it by changing only their alignment with Adam's coordinate axes. Synthetic and last-layer language-model experiments support the predicted advantage.

Abstract:Different optimizers can fit the same training data while selecting classifiers with substantially different geometries, but whether this difference provably affects population performance remains unclear. We show that row-wise normalization can achieve strictly higher population accuracy than full-batch Adam, a proxy for random-reshuffling Adam, and exact-SVD Muon in high-dimensional multiclass classification. Under an isotropic Gaussian-cloud data model, this advantage arises because row normalization's class-wise Euclidean geometry asymptotically preserves the population decision-boundary directions, whereas Adam's coordinate-wise geometry and Muon's spectral geometry introduce nonvanishing distortions. Beyond isotropy, the advantage persists for full-batch training on class means with independently oriented class-mean and test-noise covariances. It holds for power-law spectra with class-mean exponent below one, even under heavily anisotropic test noise. When both covariances are diagonal and sufficiently close, the advantage over Adam can reverse, while applying the same random rotation to both restores it by changing only their alignment with Adam's coordinate axes. Synthetic and last-layer language-model experiments support the predicted advantage.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2610.11309 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.11309v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11309 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 263 words

Related coverage