Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces an LLM-based pipeline for analyzing media bias by leveraging entity mentions and sentiment annotations across thousands of news articles. The study evaluates prompt strategies, demonstrating how simpler instructions can balance execution efficiency with annotation coverage while providing actionable insights into source-level framing patterns.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

From Entity Mentions to Tone: An LLM-Based Pipeline for Media Bias Analysis

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.17454v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents a pipeline for analyzing media bias and framing in online news. The pipeline groups articles into topics and events, adds named-entity and sentiment annotations, and compares news sources through people mentions, source-level tone, and event-level coverage patterns. We apply it to 8,358 Albanian news articles collected from GDELT and compare the resulting annotations with GDELT's automated annotations. The results show moderate agreement for sentiment and entity extraction, as well as additional person-entity pairs that can potentially support the bias analysis. We compare two annotation prompts and find that stricter sentiment-validation rules remove label-score inconsistencies but increase execution time and reduce annotation coverage. Based on these results, the simpler prompt is used for the rest of the analysis. We have provided sample analysis on source-level framing pro les, person-level tone differences across sources, and event-level gatekeeping and coverage indicators. These outputs show how the same news collection can be used to examine what sources cover, how they describe public figures, and where coverage is concentrated. The approach is particularly useful in settings where manually verified datasets or specialized language tools are limited.

Abstract:This paper presents a pipeline for analyzing media bias and framing in online news. The pipeline groups articles into topics and events, adds named-entity and sentiment annotations, and compares news sources through people mentions, source-level tone, and event-level coverage patterns. We apply it to 8,358 Albanian news articles collected from GDELT and compare the resulting annotations with GDELT's automated annotations. The results show moderate agreement for sentiment and entity extraction, as well as additional person-entity pairs that can potentially support the bias analysis. We compare two annotation prompts and find that stricter sentiment-validation rules remove label-score inconsistencies but increase execution time and reduce annotation coverage. Based on these results, the simpler prompt is used for the rest of the analysis. We have provided sample analysis on source-level framing pro les, person-level tone differences across sources, and event-level gatekeeping and coverage indicators. These outputs show how the same news collection can be used to examine what sources cover, how they describe public figures, and where coverage is concentrated. The approach is particularly useful in settings where manually verified datasets or specialized language tools are limited.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2608.17454 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.17454v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17454 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

https://doi.org/10.1109/ECAI69016.2026.11613638 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 289 words

Related coverage