Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

PRODiGI represents a significant methodological shift in generative modeling by converting empirical data directly into explicit, executable programs rather than relying on black-box density estimators. This approach offers substantial speed improvements and enhanced interpretability for tabular data tasks, allowing for direct sampling and score evaluation independent of the underlying neural network weights. The introduction of program-space fine-tuning further demonstrates how differentiable programming can be integrated with deep learning to reduce generation error metrics like MMD.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

From Data to Program: Fast & Direct Generative Program Inference from Empirical Data

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.35348v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Estimating probability densities from a finite set of samples typically requires dataset-specific model fitting. We introduce PRODiGI, a pretrained data-to-program model that infers an explicit, executable generative program in a single forward pass. Pretrained on synthetic datasets paired with their ground-truth programs, PRODiGI accommodates diverse generative families and data dimensionalities through template prediction and non-autoregressive program parameter decoding. Its inferred programs support direct sampling, density and score evaluation, and inspection independently of the pretrained model. We further introduce program-space fine-tuning, which refines differentiable program parameters by matching generated and empirical samples while keeping model parameters intact. Experiments show that PRODiGI achieves lower average density and score MAE than existing pretrained models, while offering multi-fold speedups over its closest competitors. Program-space fine-tuning further reduces generation MMD by 84%. By turning empirical data into explicit, reusable programs, PRODiGI introduces a new direction for fast, interpretable tabular generative modeling.

Abstract:Estimating probability densities from a finite set of samples typically requires dataset-specific model fitting. We introduce PRODiGI, a pretrained data-to-program model that infers an explicit, executable generative program in a single forward pass. Pretrained on synthetic datasets paired with their ground-truth programs, PRODiGI accommodates diverse generative families and data dimensionalities through template prediction and non-autoregressive program parameter decoding. Its inferred programs support direct sampling, density and score evaluation, and inspection independently of the pretrained model. We further introduce program-space fine-tuning, which refines differentiable program parameters by matching generated and empirical samples while keeping model parameters intact. Experiments show that PRODiGI achieves lower average density and score MAE than existing pretrained models, while offering multi-fold speedups over its closest competitors. Program-space fine-tuning further reduces generation MMD by 84%. By turning empirical data into explicit, reusable programs, PRODiGI introduces a new direction for fast, interpretable tabular generative modeling.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.35348 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.35348v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35348 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 243 words

Related coverage