aiqbench analysis
This research investigates how large reasoning models encode the potential success of different next-token candidates within their internal representations during mathematical problem solving. By demonstrating that long-horizon candidate value is linearly decodable from hidden states and attention outputs, the study offers a novel method to probe model confidence beyond standard probability estimates. These findings provide actionable insights for steering generation processes to improve reasoning accuracy in complex tasks.
From Candidate Tokens to Final Outcomes: Decoding Relative Long-Horizon Candidate Value from Reasoning Model Representations
arXiv:2610.15412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large reasoning models generate reasoning trajectories token by token. At a given prefix, multiple next-token candidates may be plausible, yet shape subsequent reasoning and differ in their chances of leading to the correct answer. Whether these differences are reflected in internal representations remains unclear. To study this question, we define relative long-horizon candidate value to quantify within-prefix differences and construct the Reasoning Candidate-Token Value (RCTV) dataset, pairing mathematical reasoning prefixes with plausible next-token candidates and their empirical long-horizon candidate values. Using RCTV, we examine hidden states, multilayer perceptron outputs, and attention outputs at candidate positions with sparse linear probes. Experimental results provide evidence that relative long-horizon candidate value is linearly decodable from these representations at multiple layers. Candidate-value probes can also outperform probability- and embedding-based baselines. Furthermore, a controlled online intervention experiment shows that using the decoded signals to guide token selection during generation can improve the chances of eventual success. Our findings provide evidence that internal representations encode information about relative long-horizon candidate value, offering insights into how local candidate-level representations relate to long-horizon reasoning outcomes.
Abstract:Large reasoning models generate reasoning trajectories token by token. At a given prefix, multiple next-token candidates may be plausible, yet shape subsequent reasoning and differ in their chances of leading to the correct answer. Whether these differences are reflected in internal representations remains unclear. To study this question, we define relative long-horizon candidate value to quantify within-prefix differences and construct the Reasoning Candidate-Token Value (RCTV) dataset, pairing mathematical reasoning prefixes with plausible next-token candidates and their empirical long-horizon candidate values. Using RCTV, we examine hidden states, multilayer perceptron outputs, and attention outputs at candidate positions with sparse linear probes. Experimental results provide evidence that relative long-horizon candidate value is linearly decodable from these representations at multiple layers. Candidate-value probes can also outperform probability- and embedding-based baselines. Furthermore, a controlled online intervention experiment shows that using the decoded signals to guide token selection during generation can improve the chances of eventual success. Our findings provide evidence that internal representations encode information about relative long-horizon candidate value, offering insights into how local candidate-level representations relate to long-horizon reasoning outcomes.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.15412 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.15412v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15412 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

Always ask your agent to be honest
LessWrong · Sep 16, 2026

[AINews] Here are 6 Clones of Jev in 2 days
Latent Space · Sep 19, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026