aiqbench analysis
This research proposes Abusive Language Identification (ALI) as a sequence-labeling task to simultaneously extract abusive spans and target mentions, addressing limitations in current sentence-level classification systems for content moderation. The study evaluates this approach against standard methods on production data, finding that while ALI offers localized insights particularly useful for implicit abuse, recovering exact boundaries remains challenging. This work advances practical machine learning applications for text moderation by shifting from binary classification to structured span extraction.
From Abusive Language Classification to Sequence Labeling Identification
arXiv:2610.06287v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial content moderation must process massive message streams under tight latency constraints, yet most abusive language (AL) detection systems rely on sentence-level classification (ALC), which neither localizes abusive spans nor identifies who is targeted. We define Abusive Language Identification (ALI) as a sequence-labeling task that jointly extracts AL spans and target mentions, and assess whether this approach can be used for text moderation. On a pilot corpus drawn from a production moderation pipeline, we compare ALI with ALC on cross-domain generalization and implicit abuse, and we also evaluate AL and target span detection. ALI remains competitive with ALC while providing localized outputs for moderators, with a modest and configuration-sensitive advantage on implicit abuse. Exact AL boundaries and target spans remain difficult to recover. We complement this comparison with a qualitative analysis and discuss perspectives on complete target--span linking and on structured benchmarks for ALI.
Abstract:Industrial content moderation must process massive message streams under tight latency constraints, yet most abusive language (AL) detection systems rely on sentence-level classification (ALC), which neither localizes abusive spans nor identifies who is targeted. We define Abusive Language Identification (ALI) as a sequence-labeling task that jointly extracts AL spans and target mentions, and assess whether this approach can be used for text moderation. On a pilot corpus drawn from a production moderation pipeline, we compare ALI with ALC on cross-domain generalization and implicit abuse, and we also evaluate AL and target span detection. ALI remains competitive with ALC while providing localized outputs for moderators, with a modest and configuration-sensitive advantage on implicit abuse. Exact AL boundaries and target spans remain difficult to recover. We complement this comparison with a qualitative analysis and discuss perspectives on complete target--span linking and on structured benchmarks for ALI.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.06287 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.06287v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06287 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 242 words
Related coverage

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Biomedical Imaging's Real Bottleneck Is the Data, Not the Model
Databricks · Oct 8, 2026
TANDEM: Temporal-Aware Neural Detection for Multimodal Hate Speech
arXiv · Jul 31, 2026