Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study empirically evaluates the synergy between fractional optimization techniques and fractal activation functions within neural network training frameworks. The findings suggest that while controlled fractional memory offers promising improvements, particularly on perturbed surfaces or with specific activations, it serves as an additive enhancement rather than a universal replacement for standard methods. For researchers in advanced model architectures, this work highlights selective pairing strategies to improve convergence without overgeneralizing the utility of these niche mathematical tools.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Fractional Optimizers Meet Fractal Activation Functions: An Empirical Study of Multi-Scale Optimization in Neural Network

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.14636v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fractional optimization methods and fractal activation functions are two independent directions for improving neural network training. Fractional optimizers extend first-order optimization through fractional derivatives and memory effects, whereas fractal activations introduce multi-scale nonlinear representations based on self-similar Weierstrass- and Blancmange-type functions. Here, we investigate their interaction within a unified experimental framework. We evaluate fractional optimizer families on Ackley and Himmelblau benchmark surfaces, in standard form and with additive Weierstrass-type perturbations, and then in feed-forward neural networks with conventional and fractal activations on ten classification datasets. The comparison includes standard methods, regularization-style optimizers, explicit and adaptive memory-based fractional optimizers, and other representative literature methods. Overall, fractional optimization and fractal activations show useful but selective pairings. Regularization-style fractional scaling performs well with selected fractal activations in network training, while Gr\"unwald--Letnikov memory is most relevant on perturbed surfaces. Adaptive memory improves plain memory substitution in several cases, supporting controlled fractional memory as a promising direction rather than a universal replacement.

Abstract:Fractional optimization methods and fractal activation functions are two independent directions for improving neural network training. Fractional optimizers extend first-order optimization through fractional derivatives and memory effects, whereas fractal activations introduce multi-scale nonlinear representations based on self-similar Weierstrass- and Blancmange-type functions. Here, we investigate their interaction within a unified experimental framework. We evaluate fractional optimizer families on Ackley and Himmelblau benchmark surfaces, in standard form and with additive Weierstrass-type perturbations, and then in feed-forward neural networks with conventional and fractal activations on ten classification datasets. The comparison includes standard methods, regularization-style optimizers, explicit and adaptive memory-based fractional optimizers, and other representative literature methods. Overall, fractional optimization and fractal activations show useful but selective pairings. Regularization-style fractional scaling performs well with selected fractal activations in network training, while Grünwald--Letnikov memory is most relevant on perturbed surfaces. Adaptive memory improves plain memory substitution in several cases, supporting controlled fractional memory as a promising direction rather than a universal replacement.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.14636 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.14636v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14636 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 254 words

Related coverage