Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical bottleneck in training deep-search agents by introducing FORT, a framework designed to synthesize training data that resists common "shortcut" behaviors where models bypass actual evidence gathering. By formalizing shortcut risks and evaluating agent performance through trajectory diagnostics rather than superficial metrics, the study demonstrates significant improvements in retrieval effort and answer dependency across various model scales. The work provides a robust methodology for enhancing the reliability and reasoning depth of future autonomous search systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

FORT-Searcher: Synthesizing Shortcut-Resistant Search Tasks for Training Deep Search Agents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.12087v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Training deep-search agents requires verifiable questions that demand substantial evidence acquisition, yet structurally complex tasks may still admit cheap identifying routes when clues are overly selective, co-covered by the same evidence, directly searchable, or resolved from solver priors. We formalize this gap with a shortcut-aware difficulty framework that distinguishes intended construction complexity from identifying routes available through retrieval. Guided by this framework, we introduce FORT, a Framework of Shortcut-Resistant Training-Data Synthesis, which targets four shortcut risks across entity selection, evidence graph construction, question formulation, and adversarial refinement. We evaluate realized search behavior with solver-conditioned trajectory diagnostics rather than graph complexity or search length alone. Compared with existing open-source deep-search datasets, FORT shows later answer exposure, higher retrieval effort, lower single-clue selectivity, greater evidence dispersion, and higher realized pre-answer dependency costs. Using the resulting trajectories, we train FORT-Searcher with supervised fine-tuning alone. Across model scales, FORT-Searcher consistently improves over its backbones, achieving the strongest overall performance among similarly sized agents. Relevant resources will be made available at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/FORT-Searcher.

Abstract:Training deep-search agents requires verifiable questions that demand substantial evidence acquisition, yet structurally complex tasks may still admit cheap identifying routes when clues are overly selective, co-covered by the same evidence, directly searchable, or resolved from solver priors. We formalize this gap with a shortcut-aware difficulty framework that distinguishes intended construction complexity from identifying routes available through retrieval. Guided by this framework, we introduce FORT, a Framework of Shortcut-Resistant Training-Data Synthesis, which targets four shortcut risks across entity selection, evidence graph construction, question formulation, and adversarial refinement. We evaluate realized search behavior with solver-conditioned trajectory diagnostics rather than graph complexity or search length alone. Compared with existing open-source deep-search datasets, FORT shows later answer exposure, higher retrieval effort, lower single-clue selectivity, greater evidence dispersion, and higher realized pre-answer dependency costs. Using the resulting trajectories, we train FORT-Searcher with supervised fine-tuning alone. Across model scales, FORT-Searcher consistently improves over its backbones, achieving the strongest overall performance among similarly sized agents. Relevant resources will be made available at this https URL.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2606.12087 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.12087v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.12087 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 262 words

Related coverage