Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Formal Evidence Generation for Assurance Cases for Robotic Software Models
arXiv:2602.03550v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Robotics and Autonomous Systems are increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains, so that demonstrating their safety is essential. Assurance Cases (ACs) provide structured arguments supported by evidence, but generating and maintaining this evidence is labour-intensive, error-prone, and difficult to keep consistent as systems evolve. We present a model-based approach to systematically generating AC evidence by embedding formal verification into the assurance workflow. The approach addresses three challenges: systematically deriving formal assertions from natural language requirements using templates, orchestrating multiple formal verification tools to handle diverse property types, and integrating formal evidence production into the workflow. Leveraging RoboChart, a domain-specific modelling language with formal semantics, we combine model checking and theorem proving in our approach. Structured requirements are automatically transformed into formal assertions using predefined templates, and verification results are automatically integrated as evidence. Case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
Abstract:Robotics and Autonomous Systems are increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains, so that demonstrating their safety is essential. Assurance Cases (ACs) provide structured arguments supported by evidence, but generating and maintaining this evidence is labour-intensive, error-prone, and difficult to keep consistent as systems evolve. We present a model-based approach to systematically generating AC evidence by embedding formal verification into the assurance workflow. The approach addresses three challenges: systematically deriving formal assertions from natural language requirements using templates, orchestrating multiple formal verification tools to handle diverse property types, and integrating formal evidence production into the workflow. Leveraging RoboChart, a domain-specific modelling language with formal semantics, we combine model checking and theorem proving in our approach. Structured requirements are automatically transformed into formal assertions using predefined templates, and verification results are automatically integrated as evidence. Case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
This is a preprint. Accepted for publication in Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Formal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2602.03550 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2602.03550v2 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.03550 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words
Related coverage
A Local Agentic AI Framework to Generate Edge Case Scenarios for Safety Assurance
arXiv · Oct 12, 2026
ScenicProver: A Framework for Compositional Probabilistic Verification of Learning-Enabled Systems
arXiv · Nov 3, 2026
Dissecting Neuro-Symbolic Quality Assurance for Synthetic Oncology Data Generation
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026
Bridging Generation and Training: A Systematic Review of Quality Issues in LLMs for Code
arXiv · Oct 20, 2026