aiqbench analysis
This research introduces DREAM, an agent-intrinsic framework that leverages neuro-inspired mechanisms to selectively "forget" poisoned memories in large language model agents without external modules or retraining. By destabilizing malicious engrams through implicit reactivation, the method achieves over 95% reduction in backdoor attack success while significantly improving runtime efficiency and token consumption compared to existing defenses. The approach represents a critical advancement in securing autonomous AI systems against memory-poisoning vulnerabilities while maintaining operational utility.
Forgetting is Not Always Bad: A Neuro-Inspired Memory Repair Mechanism for Poisoned LLM Agents
arXiv:2610.13267v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are highly vulnerable to memory-poisoning attacks. Existing defenses primarily rely on external modules for either static memory isolation or continuous online auditing, resulting in low memory efficiency and high computational overhead. To address these limitations, inspired by neuroscientific mechanisms that weak reactivation can destabilize memories and induce decay in the absence of reinforcement, we propose an agent-intrinsic training-free memory repair framework, DREAM (Dynamic Reactivation for Engram Attenuation in Memory), that enables selective functional forgetting of poisoned memories. Specifically, DREAM implements a three-stage pipeline: perturbation-induced implicit reactivation to reveal the structural fragility of malicious memories, adaptive anomaly diagnosis based on multi-dimensional activation patterns to detect topological anomalies, and a dynamic memory repair module that selectively suppresses harmful memories while reinforcing benign ones. Extensive experiments across diverse attackers and real-world tasks demonstrate that DREAM reduces attack success rates by over 95\% against backdoor poisoning while preserving strong benign utility. DREAM also achieves competitive robustness against injection attacks. In terms of runtime and token consumption, DREAM achieves up to a 2.13$\times$ speedup and a 37.7\% reduction in token consumption compared with A-MemGuard. Furthermore, DREAM also achieves a task success rate of 92.96\% on poisoned multi-agent systems.
Abstract:Large language model (LLM) agents are highly vulnerable to memory-poisoning attacks. Existing defenses primarily rely on external modules for either static memory isolation or continuous online auditing, resulting in low memory efficiency and high computational overhead. To address these limitations, inspired by neuroscientific mechanisms that weak reactivation can destabilize memories and induce decay in the absence of reinforcement, we propose an agent-intrinsic training-free memory repair framework, DREAM (Dynamic Reactivation for Engram Attenuation in Memory), that enables selective functional forgetting of poisoned memories. Specifically, DREAM implements a three-stage pipeline: perturbation-induced implicit reactivation to reveal the structural fragility of malicious memories, adaptive anomaly diagnosis based on multi-dimensional activation patterns to detect topological anomalies, and a dynamic memory repair module that selectively suppresses harmful memories while reinforcing benign ones. Extensive experiments across diverse attackers and real-world tasks demonstrate that DREAM reduces attack success rates by over 95\% against backdoor poisoning while preserving strong benign utility. DREAM also achieves competitive robustness against injection attacks. In terms of runtime and token consumption, DREAM achieves up to a 2.13$\times$ speedup and a 37.7\% reduction in token consumption compared with A-MemGuard. Furthermore, DREAM also achieves a task success rate of 92.96\% on poisoned multi-agent systems.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.13267 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.13267v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13267 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 292 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

The payload: the semantic layer, memory, and the loop that fills it
Neo4j · Aug 10, 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · Sep 14, 2026

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026