aiqbench analysis
This research introduces SCROLL, a novel framework for forecasting stochastic dynamical systems by integrating uncertainty quantification directly into the model's final layer beliefs. By leveraging computable ground truth from dynamic processes like the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, the method achieves superior calibration and efficiency compared to standard multi-task approaches that rely on tuned loss grids. The technique effectively handles heteroscedasticity in complex systems, offering a robust solution for predicting multiple observables with accurate likelihood distributions.
Forecasting Multiple Observables with SCROLL: Score-Trained Uncertainty for Stochastic Dynamics
arXiv:2608.25898v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Forecasting a stochastic dynamical system rarely means a single number: one wants several observables---future state, threshold event, regime label---each with its own likelihood. Standard multi-task recipes balance per-task losses, tuned or learned. We instead compose the observables' likelihoods in per-task free-routed last-layer beliefs on a shared backbone; this absorbs unit-dependent loss scaling into likelihood parameters learned in the same gradient pass. Stochastic dynamics supply what static benchmarks cannot: computable ground truth for the predictive variance. Results land where theory puts them: on the well-specified, homoscedastic Ornstein--Uhlenbeck process the learned predictive law recovers the analytic kernel and correctly specified baselines tie. On heteroscedastic systems (stochastic Lorenz-63, real air-quality data) the belief's input-dependent variance separates: best single-run NLL on the state and regime tasks, calibration matched only by arms whose NLL it beats, at a fraction of the tuned grids' cost. On the real series the state margin holds across five rolling origins.
Abstract:Forecasting a stochastic dynamical system rarely means a single number: one wants several observables---future state, threshold event, regime label---each with its own likelihood. Standard multi-task recipes balance per-task losses, tuned or learned. We instead compose the observables' likelihoods in per-task free-routed last-layer beliefs on a shared backbone; this absorbs unit-dependent loss scaling into likelihood parameters learned in the same gradient pass. Stochastic dynamics supply what static benchmarks cannot: computable ground truth for the predictive variance. Results land where theory puts them: on the well-specified, homoscedastic Ornstein--Uhlenbeck process the learned predictive law recovers the analytic kernel and correctly specified baselines tie. On heteroscedastic systems (stochastic Lorenz-63, real air-quality data) the belief's input-dependent variance separates: best single-run NLL on the state and regime tasks, calibration matched only by arms whose NLL it beats, at a fraction of the tuned grids' cost. On the real series the state margin holds across five rolling origins.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.25898 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.25898v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25898 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words
Related coverage
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 11, 2026

Turn Your Latest Observations Into Timely Weather Decisions With NVIDIA Earth-2
NVIDIA · Sep 21, 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · Sep 14, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026