Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces SCROLL, a novel framework for forecasting stochastic dynamical systems by integrating uncertainty quantification directly into the model's final layer beliefs. By leveraging computable ground truth from dynamic processes like the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, the method achieves superior calibration and efficiency compared to standard multi-task approaches that rely on tuned loss grids. The technique effectively handles heteroscedasticity in complex systems, offering a robust solution for predicting multiple observables with accurate likelihood distributions.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Forecasting Multiple Observables with SCROLL: Score-Trained Uncertainty for Stochastic Dynamics

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.25898v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Forecasting a stochastic dynamical system rarely means a single number: one wants several observables---future state, threshold event, regime label---each with its own likelihood. Standard multi-task recipes balance per-task losses, tuned or learned. We instead compose the observables' likelihoods in per-task free-routed last-layer beliefs on a shared backbone; this absorbs unit-dependent loss scaling into likelihood parameters learned in the same gradient pass. Stochastic dynamics supply what static benchmarks cannot: computable ground truth for the predictive variance. Results land where theory puts them: on the well-specified, homoscedastic Ornstein--Uhlenbeck process the learned predictive law recovers the analytic kernel and correctly specified baselines tie. On heteroscedastic systems (stochastic Lorenz-63, real air-quality data) the belief's input-dependent variance separates: best single-run NLL on the state and regime tasks, calibration matched only by arms whose NLL it beats, at a fraction of the tuned grids' cost. On the real series the state margin holds across five rolling origins.

Abstract:Forecasting a stochastic dynamical system rarely means a single number: one wants several observables---future state, threshold event, regime label---each with its own likelihood. Standard multi-task recipes balance per-task losses, tuned or learned. We instead compose the observables' likelihoods in per-task free-routed last-layer beliefs on a shared backbone; this absorbs unit-dependent loss scaling into likelihood parameters learned in the same gradient pass. Stochastic dynamics supply what static benchmarks cannot: computable ground truth for the predictive variance. Results land where theory puts them: on the well-specified, homoscedastic Ornstein--Uhlenbeck process the learned predictive law recovers the analytic kernel and correctly specified baselines tie. On heteroscedastic systems (stochastic Lorenz-63, real air-quality data) the belief's input-dependent variance separates: best single-run NLL on the state and regime tasks, calibration matched only by arms whose NLL it beats, at a fraction of the tuned grids' cost. On the real series the state margin holds across five rolling origins.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.25898 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.25898v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25898 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words

Related coverage