Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

ForceRFT advances robotic manipulation by integrating force feedback into vision-language-action policies to overcome the limitations of demonstration-only training. This framework enables robots to learn contact-dependent corrections from both human supervision and autonomous outcomes, significantly improving success rates in complex tasks like assembly and insertion. The approach represents a meaningful step toward more robust and adaptive embodied AI systems that can handle physical interactions effectively.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ForceRFT: Refining VLA Actions through Force-Guided Residual Reinforcement Learning

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.22840v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Force-conditioned vision-language-action (VLA) policies can respond to contact, but when trained solely on demonstrations, their recovery behavior may be limited by demonstration coverage, and they do not learn from deployment outcomes. Human corrective imitation provides additional recovery examples, but its objective matches local action targets without explicitly optimizing task return. We present ForceRFT, a force-guided residual reinforcement learning framework that learns contact-dependent corrections from human supervision and autonomous task outcomes. A frozen, demonstration-trained SmolVLA-based prior generates force-conditioned action chunks, while a lightweight residual actor refines individual end-effector pose commands using wrist feedback acquired during chunk execution. The decision-time wrist wrench, its temporal change, and the selected base motion condition both residual correction and value estimation. Human corrections supervise the residual actor, while verified autonomous transitions train the twin critics and support value-guided updates to the same actor. Bootstrapping is restricted to autonomous segments, preventing TD credit from crossing human-intervention boundaries. Real-robot experiments on plug insertion, ring-on-peg assembly, and whiteboard wiping show higher autonomous success rates than the evaluated demonstration-trained and residual-imitation baselines. Comparisons with residual imitation support value-guided residual optimization, while plug-insertion ablations indicate the benefit of direct execution-time wrist feedback.

Abstract:Force-conditioned vision-language-action (VLA) policies can respond to contact, but when trained solely on demonstrations, their recovery behavior may be limited by demonstration coverage, and they do not learn from deployment outcomes. Human corrective imitation provides additional recovery examples, but its objective matches local action targets without explicitly optimizing task return. We present ForceRFT, a force-guided residual reinforcement learning framework that learns contact-dependent corrections from human supervision and autonomous task outcomes. A frozen, demonstration-trained SmolVLA-based prior generates force-conditioned action chunks, while a lightweight residual actor refines individual end-effector pose commands using wrist feedback acquired during chunk execution. The decision-time wrist wrench, its temporal change, and the selected base motion condition both residual correction and value estimation. Human corrections supervise the residual actor, while verified autonomous transitions train the twin critics and support value-guided updates to the same actor. Bootstrapping is restricted to autonomous segments, preventing TD credit from crossing human-intervention boundaries. Real-robot experiments on plug insertion, ring-on-peg assembly, and whiteboard wiping show higher autonomous success rates than the evaluated demonstration-trained and residual-imitation baselines. Comparisons with residual imitation support value-guided residual optimization, while plug-insertion ablations indicate the benefit of direct execution-time wrist feedback.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.22840 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.22840v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22840 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 284 words

Related coverage