aiqbench analysis
ForagerSim introduces a new benchmark platform designed to test whether embodied AI agents can learn flexible, map-based reasoning comparable to animal cognition in dynamic environments. The study highlights that current reinforcement learning policies struggle with complex topologies and large scales unless they explicitly form internal cognitive maps, identifying this capability as a critical bottleneck for advanced robotics. This work advances the field by providing a modular simulation environment that isolates variables like perception, scale, and dynamics to evaluate progress toward generalizable spatial reasoning in AI systems.
ForagerSim: Evaluating Embodied Map-Based Reasoning in Large-Scale Dynamic Worlds
arXiv:2610.26395v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Animals build cognitive maps of vast environments, use them to perform map-based navigation, and might even be reusing the same circuitry used in spatial reasoning for creating and using maps of arbitrary task-spaces. In contrast, current embodied AI systems either rely on hand-engineered mapping pipelines, which break in the presence of unmodeled dynamics and are restricted to metric space, or on learned policies that rarely form map-like representations at all. Developing architectures that could learn to build and use map-like representations as flexibly as animals is, however, difficult because few embodied AI benchmarks actually require map-based reasoning. To address this, we present ForagerSim --- an interdisciplinary research platform and simulation environment focused on embodied tasks that require map-based reasoning, with scenarios ranging from mobile-robot search and rescue to animal foraging in both complex mazes and vast, potentially infinite open areas. ForagerSim is highly modular and allows modifying independent axes of difficulty related to perception (abstract 2D sensing to full RGB or LiDAR), scale (room-scale to multi-km scale), topology (open-fields to complex mazes), dynamics (smoke, debris, sensorimotor failures and others) and tasks (from simple 2D coverage to foraging-inspired well-alternation tasks). We compare reinforcement learning baselines with a simple engineered robotics stack and a human player on 8 example worlds which show how different difficulty axes affect existing methods. Our results show that, when sensing is simplified to 2D, learned policies can perform multi-object search and well-alternation tasks surprisingly well in simple topologies, but they fall short of human performance in larger or more complex-topology environments where map-based baselines perform well, suggesting that map-based reasoning is the bottleneck in these scenarios.
Abstract:Animals build cognitive maps of vast environments, use them to perform map-based navigation, and might even be reusing the same circuitry used in spatial reasoning for creating and using maps of arbitrary task-spaces. In contrast, current embodied AI systems either rely on hand-engineered mapping pipelines, which break in the presence of unmodeled dynamics and are restricted to metric space, or on learned policies that rarely form map-like representations at all. Developing architectures that could learn to build and use map-like representations as flexibly as animals is, however, difficult because few embodied AI benchmarks actually require map-based reasoning. To address this, we present ForagerSim --- an interdisciplinary research platform and simulation environment focused on embodied tasks that require map-based reasoning, with scenarios ranging from mobile-robot search and rescue to animal foraging in both complex mazes and vast, potentially infinite open areas. ForagerSim is highly modular and allows modifying independent axes of difficulty related to perception (abstract 2D sensing to full RGB or LiDAR), scale (room-scale to multi-km scale), topology (open-fields to complex mazes), dynamics (smoke, debris, sensorimotor failures and others) and tasks (from simple 2D coverage to foraging-inspired well-alternation tasks). We compare reinforcement learning baselines with a simple engineered robotics stack and a human player on 8 example worlds which show how different difficulty axes affect existing methods. Our results show that, when sensing is simplified to 2D, learned policies can perform multi-object search and well-alternation tasks surprisingly well in simple topologies, but they fall short of human performance in larger or more complex-topology environments where map-based baselines perform well, suggesting that map-based reasoning is the bottleneck in these scenarios.
Robotics (cs.RO); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.26395 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.26395v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.26395 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 365 words