aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces a novel empirical risk estimator designed to improve binary classification in highly imbalanced Positive and Unlabeled (PU) learning scenarios. By effectively handling cases where unlabeled data is dominated by negatives, the method achieves state-of-the-art results on tasks like fraud detection and financial misstatement identification. The approach addresses a critical gap in current machine learning frameworks that struggle with hard-to-detect positive examples resembling negative ones.
Focused PU learning from imbalanced data
arXiv:2605.14467v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a new method of learning from positive and unlabeled (PU) examples in highly imbalanced datasets. Many real-world problems, such as disease gene identification, targeted marketing, fraud detection, and recommender systems, are hard to address with machine learning methods, due to limited labeled data. Often, training data comprises positive and unlabeled instances, the latter typically being dominated by negative, but including also several positive instances. While PU learning is well-studied, few methods address imbalanced settings or hard-to-detect positive examples that resemble negative ones. Our approach uses a focused empirical risk estimator, incorporating both positive and unlabeled examples to train binary classifiers. Empirical evaluations demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on imbalanced datasets under two labeling mechanisms - selecting positives completely at random (SCAR) and selecting at random (SAR). Beyond these controlled experiments, we demonstrate the value of the proposed method in the real-world application of financial misstatement detection.
Abstract:We propose a new method of learning from positive and unlabeled (PU) examples in highly imbalanced datasets. Many real-world problems, such as disease gene identification, targeted marketing, fraud detection, and recommender systems, are hard to address with machine learning methods, due to limited labeled data. Often, training data comprises positive and unlabeled instances, the latter typically being dominated by negative, but including also several positive instances. While PU learning is well-studied, few methods address imbalanced settings or hard-to-detect positive examples that resemble negative ones. Our approach uses a focused empirical risk estimator, incorporating both positive and unlabeled examples to train binary classifiers. Empirical evaluations demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on imbalanced datasets under two labeling mechanisms - selecting positives completely at random (SCAR) and selecting at random (SAR). Beyond these controlled experiments, we demonstrate the value of the proposed method in the real-world application of financial misstatement detection.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.14467 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.14467v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.14467 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-026-01264-1 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 248 words
Related coverage

Handling Imbalanced Classification: What Works Better Than SMOTE
Analytics Vidhya · Jul 12, 2026

Quandela research boosts machine learning with quantum fingerprints
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 30, 2026

Quantum Circuits Cut Data Imbalance Recall Gap by 10–25%
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 13, 2026
Generative Augmentation of Imbalanced Flight Records for Flight Diversion Prediction: A Multi-objective Optimisation Framework
arXiv · Jul 21, 2026