aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces FOCUS, a novel algorithm for online causal discovery that learns causal structures and edge weights from scratch without relying on historical observational data. By adaptively allocating interventions through an online max-min game, the method achieves instance-dependent lower bounds with optimal stopping time complexity in its dependence on confidence levels. The work advances theoretical understanding of sequential decision-making in linear-Gaussian structural equation models, offering a rigorous framework for real-time causal inference.
FOCUS: Fixed-Confidence Online Causal Learning Using Sequential Adaptive Interventions
arXiv:2609.32165v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study fully online fixed-confidence causal discovery without any historical observational data. Starting from zero samples, the learner sequentially selects interventions to recover both the causal DAG and its edge weights under a linear-Gaussian structural equation model. We establish an instance-dependent lower bound for any $(\epsilon,\delta)$-correct algorithm and propose \textsc{FOCUS}, which adaptively allocates interventions through an online max--min game. A key contribution is a computable concentration inequality for the accumulated KL divergence involving causal parameters shared across interventions. We prove that \textsc{FOCUS} is $(\epsilon,\delta)$-correct and that its expected stopping time matches the lower bound in its $\Theta(\log(1/\delta))$ dependence up to an instance-dependent constant. Experiments demonstrate improved structure and edge-weight recovery and confirm the predicted stopping-time trend. Our codes are available on https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FOCUS_code-76E5
Abstract:We study fully online fixed-confidence causal discovery without any historical observational data. Starting from zero samples, the learner sequentially selects interventions to recover both the causal DAG and its edge weights under a linear-Gaussian structural equation model. We establish an instance-dependent lower bound for any $(\epsilon,\delta)$-correct algorithm and propose \textsc{FOCUS}, which adaptively allocates interventions through an online max--min game. A key contribution is a computable concentration inequality for the accumulated KL divergence involving causal parameters shared across interventions. We prove that \textsc{FOCUS} is $(\epsilon,\delta)$-correct and that its expected stopping time matches the lower bound in its $\Theta(\log(1/\delta))$ dependence up to an instance-dependent constant. Experiments demonstrate improved structure and edge-weight recovery and confirm the predicted stopping-time trend. Our codes are available on this https URL
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.32165 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.32165v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32165 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words
Related coverage
Amazon is investing in the Lean Focused Research Organization
Amazon Science · Jul 26, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Adaptive Parallel Reasoning: The Next Paradigm in Efficient Inference Scaling
BAIR Blog · May 8, 2026

The Machines that Make the Machines
NVIDIA · Oct 7, 2026