Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Flow Reconstruction from Sparse Measurements in Urban Drainage Networks: An Application and Evaluation of Data-Driven Sparse Sensing
arXiv:2511.04556v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Urbanization and increasingly frequent intense storms are placing stress on urban drainage networks. While dense monitoring of urban drainage networks is desirable, practical constraints in time, budget, and technology hinder its full implementation. How to monitor and predict flow conditions across the entire network under constrained resources is a major challenge. To address this, we utilized and evaluated an established data-driven sparse sensing (DSS) workflow for sensor placement optimization and sewer flow reconstruction in a 77-node urban drainage network. A validated SWMM parameterization was used to construct a spatial basis using singular value decomposition (SVD), select rank-specific layouts using pivoted QR, and define the reconstruction decoder. Applied to 225 held-out simulations combining 25 plausible calibrated parameter sets with 9 rainfall events, a 3-node monitoring layout (4% of the network) achieved a median system-level Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.791 and a 10th percentile of 0.719; all simulations exceeded NSE = 0.700. The pivoted QR-selected sensor sets were benchmarked against reference sensor configurations obtained from Greedy D-optimal and genetic algorithm, matching their performance without requiring iterative layout searches. We further evaluated the framework's robustness by introducing multiplicative Gaussian noise and simulating individual sensor failures, finding that performance was insensitive to noise but varied based on the location of lost monitored nodes. The reconstruction's sensitivity to monitored node loss was consistently associated with energy-weighted modal exposure with a leave-one-node-out Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.781, which was strongly correlated with the lost node's upstream drainage area, mean adjacent circular-conduit diameter, and nodal active flow fraction.
Abstract:Urbanization and increasingly frequent intense storms are placing stress on urban drainage networks. While dense monitoring of urban drainage networks is desirable, practical constraints in time, budget, and technology hinder its full implementation. How to monitor and predict flow conditions across the entire network under constrained resources is a major challenge. To address this, we utilized and evaluated an established data-driven sparse sensing (DSS) workflow for sensor placement optimization and sewer flow reconstruction in a 77-node urban drainage network. A validated SWMM parameterization was used to construct a spatial basis using singular value decomposition (SVD), select rank-specific layouts using pivoted QR, and define the reconstruction decoder. Applied to 225 held-out simulations combining 25 plausible calibrated parameter sets with 9 rainfall events, a 3-node monitoring layout (4% of the network) achieved a median system-level Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.791 and a 10th percentile of 0.719; all simulations exceeded NSE = 0.700. The pivoted QR-selected sensor sets were benchmarked against reference sensor configurations obtained from Greedy D-optimal and genetic algorithm, matching their performance without requiring iterative layout searches. We further evaluated the framework's robustness by introducing multiplicative Gaussian noise and simulating individual sensor failures, finding that performance was insensitive to noise but varied based on the location of lost monitored nodes. The reconstruction's sensitivity to monitored node loss was consistently associated with energy-weighted modal exposure with a leave-one-node-out Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.781, which was strongly correlated with the lost node's upstream drainage area, mean adjacent circular-conduit diameter, and nodal active flow fraction.
32 pages, 10 figures. Partially presented at HydroML 2025 Symposium, Minnesota Water Resources Conference 2025, and AGU Fall Meeting 2025
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE)
arXiv:2511.04556 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2511.04556v3 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.04556 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 369 words
Related coverage

Researchers Propose Algorithm to Rebuild Fluid Flows from Limited Data
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 5, 2026
Reconstruction of SINR Maps from Sparse Measurements using Group Equivariant Non-Expansive Operators
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026
Diff-SPORT: Diffusion-based Sensor Placement Optimization and Reconstruction of Turbulent flows in urban environments
arXiv · Sep 17, 2026