aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the practical limitation of flow matching by introducing Missing-Data Flow Matching, which treats missing coordinates as latent variables rather than noise. The authors prove that under specific conditions, this approach yields exact corrections without adding estimator variance, effectively shifting the challenge to the completion model itself. Experimental results on real tabular data confirm these theoretical bounds and demonstrate robustness against distribution collapse caused by deterministic imputation methods.
Flow Matching with Missing Data
arXiv:2607.28698v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Flow matching assumes fully observed training data, which many real-world applications rarely provide. We propose Missing-Data Flow Matching, which treats the missing coordinates of training samples as latent variables and averages the flow matching loss over the values they could take. We first prove the correction is exact rather than approximate. Under missing completely at random with true completions, the incomplete-data objective equals the complete-data objective, so missingness changes nothing about what flow matching learns and the entire difficulty relocates to the completion model. Our finite-sample analysis then answers design questions that the algorithm leaves open, and the answers are not the ones intuition suggests. Missingness transfers estimator variance rather than adding it, one completion per example already matches complete-data variance exactly, and under a fixed evaluation budget one completion is optimal. A learned completion model contributes a single irreducible bias, which we bound by its expected conditional Wasserstein distance to the true completion law. Experiments numerically validate the theoretical predictions, show that deterministic rather than frozen imputation is what collapses the generated distribution, and place our method alongside strong classical and deep imputation baselines on real tabular data.
Abstract:Flow matching assumes fully observed training data, which many real-world applications rarely provide. We propose Missing-Data Flow Matching, which treats the missing coordinates of training samples as latent variables and averages the flow matching loss over the values they could take. We first prove the correction is exact rather than approximate. Under missing completely at random with true completions, the incomplete-data objective equals the complete-data objective, so missingness changes nothing about what flow matching learns and the entire difficulty relocates to the completion model. Our finite-sample analysis then answers design questions that the algorithm leaves open, and the answers are not the ones intuition suggests. Missingness transfers estimator variance rather than adding it, one completion per example already matches complete-data variance exactly, and under a fixed evaluation budget one completion is optimal. A learned completion model contributes a single irreducible bias, which we bound by its expected conditional Wasserstein distance to the true completion law. Experiments numerically validate the theoretical predictions, show that deterministic rather than frozen imputation is what collapses the generated distribution, and place our method alongside strong classical and deep imputation baselines on real tabular data.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.28698 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.28698v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.28698 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 283 words
Related coverage
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026
PAMF: Prior-Aware Multimodal Fusion for Incomplete Time Series Data
arXiv · Jun 6, 2026

Cracking the Data Science Case Study Interview
Analytics Vidhya · Jul 26, 2026

The best business budgeting tools of 2026: Expert tested
ZDNet · Jun 9, 2026