aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical gap in autonomous drone navigation by optimizing open-source LiDAR-inertial odometry for real-time embedded control rather than just benchmark accuracy. By resolving architectural bottlenecks like synchronization race conditions and execution blocking, the authors enable stable 200 Hz output rates essential for closed-loop aerial maneuvers without altering core estimator algorithms.
Flight-Ready LiDAR-Inertial Odometry for Embedded Drone Platforms
arXiv:2607.22145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Open-source LiDAR-inertial odometry (LIO) systems have achieved remarkable benchmark accuracy, yet current state-of-the-art implementations are primarily optimized for evaluation performance rather than the requirements of real-time closed-loop aerial control. When deployed onboard UAVs, this can introduce limitations that degrade flight performance. In this work, we identify five architectural deficiencies in a representative tightly coupled IESKF-based LIO implementation: odometry publishing tied to the LiDAR rate (10 Hz instead of the IMU's 200 Hz), missing velocity outputs, execution bottlenecks that block IMU processing, mutex contention, and synchronization race conditions. We introduce corresponding modifications including IMU-rate forward propagation, direct body-frame velocity publishing, SLERP-based smoothing, dual-executor isolation, and explicit synchronization protection. The resulting system increases odometry output from ~10 Hz to a stable 200 Hz, provides a complete Twist state at every IMU sample, and preserves continuity during transient LiDAR loss. Experiments on a Livox Mid-360 / Pixhawk 4 Mini autonomous UAV with motion-capture ground truth validate the approach. Since the underlying estimator (IESKF + ikd-Tree) remains unchanged, the proposed improvements can be directly applied to FAST-LIO2-derived implementations.
Abstract:Open-source LiDAR-inertial odometry (LIO) systems have achieved remarkable benchmark accuracy, yet current state-of-the-art implementations are primarily optimized for evaluation performance rather than the requirements of real-time closed-loop aerial control. When deployed onboard UAVs, this can introduce limitations that degrade flight performance. In this work, we identify five architectural deficiencies in a representative tightly coupled IESKF-based LIO implementation: odometry publishing tied to the LiDAR rate (10 Hz instead of the IMU's 200 Hz), missing velocity outputs, execution bottlenecks that block IMU processing, mutex contention, and synchronization race conditions. We introduce corresponding modifications including IMU-rate forward propagation, direct body-frame velocity publishing, SLERP-based smoothing, dual-executor isolation, and explicit synchronization protection. The resulting system increases odometry output from ~10 Hz to a stable 200 Hz, provides a complete Twist state at every IMU sample, and preserves continuity during transient LiDAR loss. Experiments on a Livox Mid-360 / Pixhawk 4 Mini autonomous UAV with motion-capture ground truth validate the approach. Since the underlying estimator (IESKF + ikd-Tree) remains unchanged, the proposed improvements can be directly applied to FAST-LIO2-derived implementations.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2607.22145 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2607.22145v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22145 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 267 words
Related coverage
Embedded Bare-Metal Radar-Inertial Odometry
arXiv · Oct 7, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

How Photonic Chips Differ From Electronic Chips
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 19, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026