aiqbench analysis
This research investigates the transferability of human-robot interaction anticipation models across different robots and datasets by decomposing predictions into geometry and pose components. The study reveals an asymmetry in cue transfer where body pose corrections improve performance from one dataset to another but not vice versa, while simple geometric baselines often outperform complex neural architectures for this specific measurement task. Ultimately, the work prioritizes understanding which visual cues drive cross-domain generalization over merely maximizing prediction accuracy.
Fixed-Reference Pose Residuals for Measuring Cross-Dataset Cue Transfer in Human-Robot Interaction Anticipation
arXiv:2610.12245v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Social and service robots in public spaces need to anticipate which nearby person is about to approach and touch them, so that a response can be prepared before contact. It is largely unknown which cues support this anticipation when a model trained with one robot is used on another robot at a different site. We study this question with a fixed-reference pose residual (FRPR) model: a geometry predictor built from the person's bounding box and mask is trained and frozen, and a temporal network then learns from body pose an additive correction to its logit, so that every prediction splits exactly into a geometry term and a pose term. Between two public egocentric datasets recorded by different robots, HUI360 and SSUP-A, with every choice made on source data, the pose correction raised average precision (AP) from 0.277 to 0.321 from SSUP-A to HUI360 and gave no measurable gain in the opposite direction; the same asymmetry held over a stronger, source-selected geometry reference. Freezing gave no AP advantage over joint training, and simple geometric baselines and tree ensembles remained competitive or better, so the construction serves measurement rather than prediction accuracy. A head-orientation residual added small gains in both directions. Post hoc, whether a person faces the camera kept its discriminative direction across datasets, whereas head pitch reversed. With thresholds chosen on source data, the neural models that use geometry detected at most 17% of target interactions. Code and processed data are available at https://github.com/WeiZhou96/FRPR-interaction-anticipation.
Abstract:Social and service robots in public spaces need to anticipate which nearby person is about to approach and touch them, so that a response can be prepared before contact. It is largely unknown which cues support this anticipation when a model trained with one robot is used on another robot at a different site. We study this question with a fixed-reference pose residual (FRPR) model: a geometry predictor built from the person's bounding box and mask is trained and frozen, and a temporal network then learns from body pose an additive correction to its logit, so that every prediction splits exactly into a geometry term and a pose term. Between two public egocentric datasets recorded by different robots, HUI360 and SSUP-A, with every choice made on source data, the pose correction raised average precision (AP) from 0.277 to 0.321 from SSUP-A to HUI360 and gave no measurable gain in the opposite direction; the same asymmetry held over a stronger, source-selected geometry reference. Freezing gave no AP advantage over joint training, and simple geometric baselines and tree ensembles remained competitive or better, so the construction serves measurement rather than prediction accuracy. A head-orientation residual added small gains in both directions. Post hoc, whether a person faces the camera kept its discriminative direction across datasets, whereas head pitch reversed. With thresholds chosen on source data, the neural models that use geometry detected at most 17% of target interactions. Code and processed data are available at this https URL.
20 pages, 5 figures, 1 table. Supplementary material available as an ancillary file
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2610.12245 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.12245v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12245 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 352 words
Related coverage

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 23, 2026

The Machines that Make the Machines
NVIDIA · Oct 7, 2026

Meet Qwen-RobotSuite: Three Embodied AI Models for VLA Manipulation, Video World Modeling, and Navigation
MarkTechPost · Jun 16, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026