Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Comms

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the hardware bottleneck in continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD) by optimizing LDPC decoders using fixed-point arithmetic, directly advancing practical quantum communication infrastructure. The study identifies specific quantization settings that balance decoding reliability with computational efficiency for large-scale implementation.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Fixed Point Exploration For CV-QKD IR QC-MET-LDPC Toward Hardware Implementation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.17960v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-speed LDPC decoding is a major bottleneck in CV-QKD and motivates hardware acceleration with fixed-point arithmetic. This work compares SPA, MSA, and NMS under a unified low-SNR fixed-point framework using common graph, matrix, and quantization settings. Multiple formats are evaluated through FER, and average iterations. The results show that performance depends strongly on the interaction between decoder rule and numerical precision. SPA achieved the best overall performance. For reduced-complexity decoders, Q16.8 was the lowest consistent precision, with NMS outperforming MSA. Practically, SPA with Q8.4 offered the best balance between reliability and hardware efficiency for large-scale implementations.

Abstract:High-speed LDPC decoding is a major bottleneck in CV-QKD and motivates hardware acceleration with fixed-point arithmetic. This work compares SPA, MSA, and NMS under a unified low-SNR fixed-point framework using common graph, matrix, and quantization settings. Multiple formats are evaluated through FER, and average iterations. The results show that performance depends strongly on the interaction between decoder rule and numerical precision. SPA achieved the best overall performance. For reduced-complexity decoders, Q16.8 was the lowest consistent precision, with NMS outperforming MSA. Practically, SPA with Q8.4 offered the best balance between reliability and hardware efficiency for large-scale implementations.

Hardware Architecture (cs.AR); Information Theory (cs.IT); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)

arXiv:2607.17960 [cs.AR]

(or arXiv:2607.17960v1 [cs.AR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.17960 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 196 words

Related coverage