aiqbench analysis
This paper investigates the computational complexity of fitting and learning propositional formulas restricted to specific sets of Boolean functions, addressing core theoretical questions in machine learning such as Occam's razor and PAC learning bounds. By analyzing both tree-based formulas and circuits, the work provides rigorous insights into the limits of learnability for logical representations, which is fundamental to understanding the theoretical underpinnings of modern AI models.
Fitting and Learning Basis-Restricted Propositional Formulas
arXiv:2609.08961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: For a finite set $O$ of Boolean functions, we consider the class of propositional formulas built using the functions in $O$ as connectives. We determine, for each possible choice of $O$, the complexity of various fitting and learning problems. These include: finding a formula that fits a given labeled sample, finding a small one (an Occam algorithm), minimizing the number of misclassified examples when the sample is not realizable (empirical risk minimization), and several forms of PAC learning. Our results apply both to formulas (represented as trees) and to circuits. We also briefly discuss the status of the same questions for other kinds of propositional fragments.
Abstract:For a finite set $O$ of Boolean functions, we consider the class of propositional formulas built using the functions in $O$ as connectives. We determine, for each possible choice of $O$, the complexity of various fitting and learning problems. These include: finding a formula that fits a given labeled sample, finding a small one (an Occam algorithm), minimizing the number of misclassified examples when the sample is not realizable (empirical risk minimization), and several forms of PAC learning. Our results apply both to formulas (represented as trees) and to circuits. We also briefly discuss the status of the same questions for other kinds of propositional fragments.
Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.08961 [cs.LO]
(or arXiv:2609.08961v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.08961 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 205 words
Related coverage
The Next Swan: Frank Ramsey, Variable Hypotheticals, and the Bet on Induction
LessWrong · Jun 8, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026