aiqbench analysis
This research paper provides a rigorous comparison of resource requirements between first and second quantized mappings for simulating bosonic systems on quantum computers. The study concludes that binary first-quantized approaches offer significant advantages in qubit efficiency and gate counts for realistic system sizes, particularly when utilizing qubitization-based phase estimation algorithms. These findings directly inform the optimization strategies needed to reduce overhead in near-term digital quantum simulations of many-body physics.
First and second quantized digital quantum simulations of bosonic systems
arXiv:2511.10124v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We compare the basic resource requirements for first and second quantized bosonic mappings in a system consisting of $N$ particles in $M$ modes. In addition to the standard binary first quantized mapping, we investigate the unary first quantized mapping. Our comparison focuses on the $k$-body reduced density matrix ($k$-RDM) and two standard bosonic Hamiltonians. The first quantized mappings use less resources for off-diagonal terms of the $k$-RDM by a factor of $ \sim N^k$, compared to the second quantized mappings. The number of gates for the first quantized binary mapping increases faster with $M$ compared to the other mappings. Nevertheless, a detailed numeric analysis reveals that the binary first quantized mapping still requires fewer gates than the binary and unary second quantized ones for realistic combinations of $N$ and $M$, while requiring exponentially fewer qubits than the unary mappings. Additionally, the number of CNOT and $R_z(\phi)$ gates necessary to express a single Trotter step of the Hamiltonian in the binary first quantized mapping is comparable to the (most efficient for a single Trotter step) unary first quantized one when $M = 2^n$ for both the Bose-Hubbard model and the harmonic trap with short-range interactions. Additionally the binary mapping leads to lower one-norms than the unary mapping making it the overall most efficient choice for qubitization-based quantum phase estimation.
Abstract:We compare the basic resource requirements for first and second quantized bosonic mappings in a system consisting of $N$ particles in $M$ modes. In addition to the standard binary first quantized mapping, we investigate the unary first quantized mapping. Our comparison focuses on the $k$-body reduced density matrix ($k$-RDM) and two standard bosonic Hamiltonians. The first quantized mappings use less resources for off-diagonal terms of the $k$-RDM by a factor of $ \sim N^k$, compared to the second quantized mappings. The number of gates for the first quantized binary mapping increases faster with $M$ compared to the other mappings. Nevertheless, a detailed numeric analysis reveals that the binary first quantized mapping still requires fewer gates than the binary and unary second quantized ones for realistic combinations of $N$ and $M$, while requiring exponentially fewer qubits than the unary mappings. Additionally, the number of CNOT and $R_z(\phi)$ gates necessary to express a single Trotter step of the Hamiltonian in the binary first quantized mapping is comparable to the (most efficient for a single Trotter step) unary first quantized one when $M = 2^n$ for both the Bose-Hubbard model and the harmonic trap with short-range interactions. Additionally the binary mapping leads to lower one-norms than the unary mapping making it the overall most efficient choice for qubitization-based quantum phase estimation.
arXiv:2511.10124 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2511.10124v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 226 words
Related coverage

Quantum algorithm prepares initial states with perfect symmetry
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 1, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

Non-Gaussian Noise Magnetometry Using Local Spin Qubits
Quantum Journal · Aug 27, 2026

Quantum Simulation of Nuclear Dynamics in First Quantization
Quantum Journal · Sep 2, 2026