Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This study demonstrates that finite-resolution experiments cannot operationally distinguish between regular Schrödinger representations and non-regular polymer quantizations in quantum mechanics. The findings highlight that additional physical inputs, such as Hamiltonian dynamics or a continuum limit, are necessary to select unique representations, with direct implications for approaches to quantum gravity.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Finite-Resolution Limits on Quantum Uniqueness

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.22001v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Stone-von Neumann theorem makes canonical quantization unique only after one imposes strong continuity of the Weyl translation groups. We show that this continuity assumption cannot be certified by any finite-resolution interrogation of the Weyl relations. A finite protocol probes only finitely many phase-space displacements and bounded expectation values, thereby determining a protocol algebra \(C_S\) generated by a finitely generated subgroup of Weyl translations, but not the regularity of an extension to the full Weyl algebra. Using the polymer representation as a canonical non-regular representation, we prove that for every regular Weyl representation, every normal state, and every finite family of bounded protocol observables, a polymer state reproduces the same expectation values to arbitrary prescribed accuracy. Thus finite agreement with Schr\"{o}dinger quantum mechanics does not operationally certify the regularity hypothesis entering uniqueness. The result does not assert physical equivalence between regular and polymer quantizations, it identifies where additional input, such as Hamiltonian dynamics, energy regularity, semiclassicality, or a continuum limit, is required to distinguish or select representations. In this precise sense, non-regular polymer kinematics are not excluded by finite Weyl data alone, a point of direct relevance to quantum-gravity motivated quantizations.

Abstract:The Stone-von Neumann theorem makes canonical quantization unique only after one imposes strong continuity of the Weyl translation groups. We show that this continuity assumption cannot be certified by any finite-resolution interrogation of the Weyl relations. A finite protocol probes only finitely many phase-space displacements and bounded expectation values, thereby determining a protocol algebra \(C_S\) generated by a finitely generated subgroup of Weyl translations, but not the regularity of an extension to the full Weyl algebra. Using the polymer representation as a canonical non-regular representation, we prove that for every regular Weyl representation, every normal state, and every finite family of bounded protocol observables, a polymer state reproduces the same expectation values to arbitrary prescribed accuracy. Thus finite agreement with Schrödinger quantum mechanics does not operationally certify the regularity hypothesis entering uniqueness. The result does not assert physical equivalence between regular and polymer quantizations, it identifies where additional input, such as Hamiltonian dynamics, energy regularity, semiclassicality, or a continuum limit, is required to distinguish or select representations. In this precise sense, non-regular polymer kinematics are not excluded by finite Weyl data alone, a point of direct relevance to quantum-gravity motivated quantizations.

arXiv:2608.22001 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2608.22001v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.22001 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Phys. Lett. B 880 (2026) 140853

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140853 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 298 words

Related coverage