Skip to content
Off-topic for aiqbench

Off-topic for aiqbench

This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.

Fine-tuning an ECG Foundation Model to Predict Coronary CT Angiography Outcomes

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2512.05136v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a major global public health burden, yet scalable pre-imaging risk stratification tools are limited. In this multicenter study, we developed and validated an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography (AI-ECG) model using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) as the anatomical reference to predict vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis ($\geq 70\%$ for RCA, LAD, LCX; $\geq 50\%$ for LM). The model was evaluated in internal and external cohorts, clinically normal ECGs, and prespecified demographic and clinical subgroups. It showed discrimination across vessels in internal validation and consistent external and normal ECG performance. Predicted probabilities increased with CCTA-defined stenosis severity and were converted into vessel-specific low-, intermediate-, and high-risk strata. Calibration and decision curve analyses supported its clinical utility. Integration with guideline-based pre-test probability improved risk reclassification, enhanced rule-out performance, and reduced the gray-zone proportion. In longitudinal follow-up, model-defined risk groups showed clear separation in major adverse cardiovascular events. Waveform- and attribution-based analyses identified structured ECG differences and physiologically meaningful signal regions linked to high-risk predictions. These results support AI-ECG as a feasible tool for pre-imaging risk stratification and clinical triage, warranting prospective validation in broader clinical settings.

Abstract:Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a major global public health burden, yet scalable pre-imaging risk stratification tools are limited. In this multicenter study, we developed and validated an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography (AI-ECG) model using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) as the anatomical reference to predict vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis ($\geq 70\%$ for RCA, LAD, LCX; $\geq 50\%$ for LM). The model was evaluated in internal and external cohorts, clinically normal ECGs, and prespecified demographic and clinical subgroups. It showed discrimination across vessels in internal validation and consistent external and normal ECG performance. Predicted probabilities increased with CCTA-defined stenosis severity and were converted into vessel-specific low-, intermediate-, and high-risk strata. Calibration and decision curve analyses supported its clinical utility. Integration with guideline-based pre-test probability improved risk reclassification, enhanced rule-out performance, and reduced the gray-zone proportion. In longitudinal follow-up, model-defined risk groups showed clear separation in major adverse cardiovascular events. Waveform- and attribution-based analyses identified structured ECG differences and physiologically meaningful signal regions linked to high-risk predictions. These results support AI-ECG as a feasible tool for pre-imaging risk stratification and clinical triage, warranting prospective validation in broader clinical settings.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2512.05136 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2512.05136v4 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.05136 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words

Related coverage